PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSGSX vs. LSFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSGSX vs. LSFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund (LSGSX) and Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Fund (LSFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSGSX achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly higher than LSFIX's 0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, LSGSX has underperformed LSFIX with an annualized return of 2.63%, while LSFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.98% annualized return.


LSGSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.03%
1Y
3.77%
3Y*
3.43%
5Y*
0.55%
10Y*
2.63%

LSFIX

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.33%
6M
0.77%
1Y
6.04%
3Y*
6.82%
5Y*
2.32%
10Y*
3.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSGSX vs. LSFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSGSX
Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund
1.24%5.66%1.80%3.63%-12.50%5.01%13.97%8.63%-2.23%3.61%
LSFIX
Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Fund
0.33%9.10%5.39%8.21%-11.74%2.89%5.38%13.56%-3.07%8.40%

Correlation

The correlation between LSGSX and LSFIX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 1995

0.52

Over the past year, LSGSX and LSFIX have become more correlated (0.78) than their long-term average of 0.52, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSGSX vs. LSFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSGSX
LSGSX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
LSGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
LSGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

LSFIX
LSFIX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LSFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
LSFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSGSX vs. LSFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund (LSGSX) and Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Fund (LSFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSGSXLSFIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.18

2.16

-0.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.72

3.29

-1.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.43

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

2.64

-1.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.04

8.83

-5.79

LSGSX vs. LSFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the LSFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSGSX and LSFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSGSXLSFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

2.16

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.49

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.82

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.90

-0.14

Drawdowns

LSGSX vs. LSFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSGSX drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, smaller than the maximum LSFIX drawdown of -26.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGSX and LSFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSGSXLSFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.20%

-26.33%

+9.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.34%

-2.80%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.66%

-5.45%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.23%

-15.86%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.23%

-19.60%

+4.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.06%

-1.07%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-3.25%

-1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

0.84%

+0.40%

Volatility

LSGSX vs. LSFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund (LSGSX) is 0.94%, while Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Fund (LSFIX) has a volatility of 1.30%. This indicates that LSGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSGSXLSFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

1.30%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.49%

2.51%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.84%

3.38%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.30%

4.92%

+1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.60%

4.95%

+0.65%

LSGSX vs. LSFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSGSX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than LSFIX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSGSX vs. LSFIX - Dividend Comparison

LSGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than LSFIX's 4.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSFIX
Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Fund
4.68%4.70%5.79%4.41%1.53%6.23%6.23%4.24%5.62%5.62%3.57%6.77%
LSGSX
Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund
2.65%3.53%3.52%3.88%8.23%5.60%0.99%1.96%2.90%2.38%1.48%0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSGSX and LSFIX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSFIX has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to LSGSX (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSGSX dropped -17.20% vs LSFIX's -26.33%.

LSFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSGSX and LSFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer