LSGSX vs. LSGBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund (LSGSX) and Loomis Sayles Global Bond Fund (LSGBX).
LSGSX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on May 19, 1991. LSGBX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on May 9, 1991.
Performance
LSGSX vs. LSGBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LSGSX vs. LSGBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSGSX Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund | -0.21% | 5.66% | 1.80% | 3.63% | -12.50% | 5.01% | 13.97% | 8.63% | -2.23% | 3.61% |
LSGBX Loomis Sayles Global Bond Fund | -1.87% | 8.52% | -2.46% | 5.48% | -17.18% | -4.94% | 13.49% | 7.52% | -2.49% | 8.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSGSX achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly higher than LSGBX's -1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, LSGSX has outperformed LSGBX with an annualized return of 2.52%, while LSGBX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.94% annualized return.
LSGSX
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- -0.21%
- 6M
- -0.11%
- 1Y
- 1.44%
- 3Y*
- 2.45%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- 2.52%
LSGBX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- -1.87%
- 6M
- -1.89%
- 1Y
- 3.52%
- 3Y*
- 2.17%
- 5Y*
- -2.03%
- 10Y*
- 0.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LSGSX vs. LSGBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSGSX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than LSGBX's 0.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LSGSX vs. LSGBX — Risk / Return Rank
LSGSX
LSGBX
LSGSX vs. LSGBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund (LSGSX) and Loomis Sayles Global Bond Fund (LSGBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSGSX | LSGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.58 | 0.83 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.81 | 1.23 | -0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.15 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 1.46 | -0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.88 | 5.18 | -1.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSGSX | LSGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | 0.83 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | -0.32 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.16 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.78 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between LSGSX and LSGBX is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LSGSX vs. LSGBX - Dividend Comparison
LSGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than LSGBX's 0.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSGSX Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund | 2.69% | 3.53% | 3.52% | 3.88% | 8.23% | 5.60% | 0.99% | 1.96% | 2.90% | 2.38% | 1.48% | 0.75% |
LSGBX Loomis Sayles Global Bond Fund | 0.11% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.31% | 4.94% | 1.75% | 0.66% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LSGSX vs. LSGBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSGSX drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, smaller than the maximum LSGBX drawdown of -26.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGSX and LSGBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSGSX | LSGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.20% | -26.86% | +9.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.36% | -4.05% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.23% | -25.41% | +10.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.23% | -26.86% | +11.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.46% | -13.99% | +10.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -4.76% | +0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.20% | 1.14% | +0.06% |
Volatility
LSGSX vs. LSGBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund (LSGSX) is 1.29%, while Loomis Sayles Global Bond Fund (LSGBX) has a volatility of 1.83%. This indicates that LSGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSGBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LSGSX | LSGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.29% | 1.83% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.81% | 3.70% | -0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.98% | 6.24% | -1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.31% | 6.59% | -0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.62% | 5.79% | -0.17% |