PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSGSX vs. LSSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSGSX vs. LSSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund (LSGSX) and Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund (LSSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSGSX achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than LSSIX's 16.24% return. Over the past 10 years, LSGSX has underperformed LSSIX with an annualized return of 2.63%, while LSSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.72% annualized return.


LSGSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.24%
6M
0.93%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
3.43%
5Y*
0.61%
10Y*
2.63%

LSSIX

1D
0.90%
1M
3.17%
YTD
16.24%
6M
15.19%
1Y
26.66%
3Y*
13.89%
5Y*
5.00%
10Y*
11.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSGSX vs. LSSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSGSX
Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund
1.24%5.66%1.80%3.63%-12.50%5.01%13.97%8.63%-2.23%3.61%
LSSIX
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund
16.24%3.57%14.94%11.92%-22.93%9.91%34.15%26.59%0.18%26.85%

Correlation

The correlation between LSGSX and LSSIX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997

-0.10

The correlation between LSGSX and LSSIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSGSX vs. LSSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSGSX
LSGSX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
LSGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
LSGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

LSSIX
LSSIX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
LSSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
LSSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSGSX vs. LSSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund (LSGSX) and Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund (LSSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSGSXLSSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.29

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

3.03

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.40

11.39

-6.99

LSGSX vs. LSSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the LSSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSGSX and LSSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSGSXLSSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

1.68

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.23

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.52

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.30

+0.45

Drawdowns

LSGSX vs. LSSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSGSX drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, smaller than the maximum LSSIX drawdown of -83.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGSX and LSSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSGSXLSSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.20%

-83.41%

+66.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.34%

-10.77%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.66%

-27.73%

+23.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.23%

-37.42%

+22.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.23%

-38.52%

+23.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.06%

-0.55%

-1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-34.51%

+29.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

2.72%

-1.48%

Volatility

LSGSX vs. LSSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund (LSGSX) is 0.92%, while Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund (LSSIX) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that LSGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSGSXLSSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

5.41%

-4.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.42%

15.08%

-12.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83%

19.39%

-15.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.30%

22.37%

-16.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.59%

22.77%

-17.18%

LSGSX vs. LSSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSGSX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than LSSIX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSGSX vs. LSSIX - Dividend Comparison

LSGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than LSSIX's 6.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSGSX
Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund
2.65%3.53%3.52%3.88%8.23%5.60%0.99%1.96%2.90%2.38%1.48%0.75%
LSSIX
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund
6.56%7.62%3.64%2.34%3.02%20.23%1.76%8.86%11.30%12.61%0.00%7.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSGSX and LSSIX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSSIX has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to LSGSX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSGSX dropped -17.20% vs LSSIX's -83.41%.

LSSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSGSX and LSSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer