LSSIX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund (LSSIX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
LSSIX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on Dec 31, 1996. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
LSSIX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LSSIX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSSIX Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund | -3.32% | 3.57% | 14.94% | 11.92% | -22.93% | 9.91% | 34.15% | 26.59% | 0.18% | 26.85% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -4.42% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSSIX achieves a -3.32% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, LSSIX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.01%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.05% annualized return.
LSSIX
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- -9.12%
- YTD
- -3.32%
- 6M
- -2.91%
- 1Y
- 12.25%
- 3Y*
- 7.26%
- 5Y*
- 1.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
VOO
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LSSIX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSSIX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LSSIX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
LSSIX
VOO
LSSIX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund (LSSIX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSSIX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.44 | 0.98 | -0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.83 | 1.50 | -0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.23 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | 1.53 | -1.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.29 | 7.29 | -7.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSSIX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 0.98 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.70 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.78 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.83 | -0.55 |
Correlation
The correlation between LSSIX and VOO is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LSSIX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
LSSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.89%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSSIX Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund | 7.89% | 7.62% | 3.64% | 2.34% | 3.02% | 20.23% | 1.76% | 8.86% | 11.30% | 12.61% | 0.00% | 7.91% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.19% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
LSSIX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSSIX drawdown since its inception was -83.41%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSSIX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSSIX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.41% | -33.99% | -49.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.96% | -11.98% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.42% | -24.52% | -12.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.52% | -33.99% | -4.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.77% | -6.29% | -4.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.70% | -3.72% | -30.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.32% | 2.52% | +4.80% |
Volatility
LSSIX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund (LSSIX) has a higher volatility of 7.42% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.29%. This indicates that LSSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LSSIX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.42% | 5.29% | +2.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.10% | 9.44% | +4.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.08% | 18.10% | +7.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.27% | 16.82% | +5.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.67% | 17.99% | +4.68% |