LSGRX vs. CTCAX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LSGRX (Loomis Sayles Growth Fund) and CTCAX (Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - LSGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Natixis, while CTCAX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Columbia. Over the past 10 years, LSGRX returned 16.08%/yr vs 24.78%/yr for CTCAX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LSGRX charges 0.64%/yr vs 1.18%/yr for CTCAX.

Performance

LSGRX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSGRX achieves a -4.55% return, which is significantly lower than CTCAX's 30.84% return. Over the past 10 years, LSGRX has underperformed CTCAX with an annualized return of 16.08%, while CTCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.78% annualized return.

LSGRX

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: -3.70%
• YTD: -4.55%
• 6M: -5.40%
• 1Y: 6.51%
• 3Y*: 16.98%
• 5Y*: 11.50%
• 10Y*: 16.08%

CTCAX

• 1D: 3.52%
• 1M: 7.73%
• YTD: 30.84%
• 6M: 30.74%
• 1Y: 58.79%
• 3Y*: 34.19%
• 5Y*: 19.84%
• 10Y*: 24.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSGRX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LSGRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund	-4.55%	14.01%	35.21%	51.30%	-27.86%	18.68%	31.76%	31.73%	-2.56%	32.63%
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A	30.84%	24.78%	31.39%	56.46%	-34.81%	22.73%	49.46%	43.91%	-1.48%	42.99%

Correlation

The correlation between LSGRX and CTCAX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2002	0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between LSGRX and CTCAX has dropped to 0.66 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LSGRX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSGRX

LSGRX Risk / Return Rank: 6
LSGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
LSGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
LSGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
LSGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
LSGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

CTCAX

CTCAX Risk / Return Rank: 76
CTCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
CTCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
CTCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
CTCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
CTCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSGRX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LSGRX	CTCAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	2.47	-2.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.73	3.04	-2.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.41	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.44	4.01	-3.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.27	14.29	-13.02

LSGRX vs. CTCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSGRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the CTCAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSGRX and CTCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LSGRX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSGRX drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, roughly equal to the maximum CTCAX drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGRX and CTCAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSGRX	CTCAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.63%	-61.04%	-2.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.83%	-14.43%	-3.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.33%	-26.67%	-0.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.69%	-39.55%	+4.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.69%	-39.55%	+4.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.73%	-0.92%	-6.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.94%	-10.67%	-7.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.64%	4.05%	+1.59%

Volatility

LSGRX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX) is 5.90%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) has a volatility of 11.73%. This indicates that LSGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSGRX	CTCAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.90%	11.73%	-5.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.31%	19.53%	-6.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.44%	23.42%	-5.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.76%	26.37%	-3.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.97%	25.05%	-4.08%

LSGRX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSGRX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than CTCAX's 1.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSGRX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison

LSGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than CTCAX's 2.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A	2.51%	3.29%	1.08%	2.36%	3.53%	4.15%	0.91%	2.55%	5.82%	3.52%	0.36%	1.80%
LSGRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund	2.32%	2.22%	5.62%	6.02%	16.47%	4.73%	4.41%	2.70%	5.82%	2.41%	1.48%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSGRX and CTCAX in my portfolio?

LSGRX and CTCAX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LSGRX or CTCAX?

CTCAX has higher volatility (11.73%) compared to LSGRX (5.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSGRX dropped -63.63% vs CTCAX's -61.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CTCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.