PortfoliosLab logo
LSGRX vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LSGRX and VOO is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

LSGRX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LSGRX:

0.91

VOO:

0.74

Sortino Ratio

LSGRX:

1.26

VOO:

1.04

Omega Ratio

LSGRX:

1.17

VOO:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

LSGRX:

0.87

VOO:

0.68

Martin Ratio

LSGRX:

2.90

VOO:

2.58

Ulcer Index

LSGRX:

7.02%

VOO:

4.93%

Daily Std Dev

LSGRX:

25.51%

VOO:

19.54%

Max Drawdown

LSGRX:

-63.63%

VOO:

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

LSGRX:

-4.13%

VOO:

-3.55%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LSGRX having a 0.88% return and VOO slightly higher at 0.90%. Over the past 10 years, LSGRX has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 15.77%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.81% annualized return.


LSGRX

YTD

0.88%

1M

9.92%

6M

1.34%

1Y

23.09%

3Y*

24.18%

5Y*

16.90%

10Y*

15.77%

VOO

YTD

0.90%

1M

6.28%

6M

-1.46%

1Y

14.27%

3Y*

14.31%

5Y*

15.89%

10Y*

12.81%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Loomis Sayles Growth Fund

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

LSGRX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSGRX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LSGRX vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSGRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LSGRX is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LSGRX is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LSGRX is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LSGRX is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LSGRX is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LSGRX is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOO is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOO is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOO is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOO is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOO is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOO is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LSGRX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LSGRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSGRX and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

LSGRX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

LSGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, more than VOO's 1.29% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LSGRX
Loomis Sayles Growth Fund
5.62%5.67%6.02%16.47%4.73%4.41%2.70%5.82%2.41%1.48%0.54%0.68%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.29%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%

Drawdowns

LSGRX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSGRX drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGRX and VOO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

LSGRX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.84%. This indicates that LSGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...