LSGR vs. VNMC

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

LSGR (Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF) and VNMC (Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LSGR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Natixis, while VNMC is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Natixis. Both are actively managed. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LSGR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for VNMC.

Performance

LSGR vs. VNMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) and Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF (VNMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LSGR

• 1D: 3.03%
• 1M: 3.11%
• 6M: 0.69%
• YTD: -1.39%
• 1Y: 5.37%
• 3Y*: 19.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.28%

VNMC

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LSGR Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF	$2.50M	$2.85M	$2.95M

LSGR vs. VNMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LSGR Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF	-1.39%	15.32%	38.52%	12.46%
VNMC Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	10.34%	12.74%

Correlation

The correlation between LSGR and VNMC is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023	0.25

Return for Risk

LSGR vs. VNMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LSGR

LSGR Risk / Return Rank: 17
LSGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
LSGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
LSGR Omega Ratio Rank: 17
LSGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
LSGR Martin Ratio Rank: 17

VNMC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LSGR vs. VNMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) and Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF (VNMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LSGR	VNMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.30	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.53	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.30	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.83	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	LSGR	VNMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.50%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.09%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.52%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LSGR	VNMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.87%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.61%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.19%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.54%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.54%	—	—

LSGR vs. VNMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSGR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than VNMC's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSGR vs. VNMC - Dividend Comparison

Neither LSGR nor VNMC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
LSGR Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF	0.00%	0.05%	0.08%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VNMC Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.49%	1.08%	4.30%	10.12%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSGR and VNMC in my portfolio?

LSGR and VNMC have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LSGR or VNMC?

On fees, LSGR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LSGR or VNMC?

LSGR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for VNMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LSGR or VNMC?

LSGR and VNMC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between LSGR and VNMC?

LSGR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VNMC is Mid Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for LSGR and 0.85% for VNMC.