LSGR vs. SGRT

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LSGR (Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.

Performance

LSGR vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSGR achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 48.90% return.

LSGR

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: 3.05%
• YTD: 0.87%
• 6M: 1.25%
• 1Y: 13.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SGRT

• 1D: -1.69%
• 1M: 9.59%
• YTD: 48.90%
• 6M: 51.74%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSGR vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LSGR Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF	0.87%	5.89%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	48.90%	25.25%

Correlation

The correlation between LSGR and SGRT is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025	0.54

Return for Risk

LSGR vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSGR

LSGR Risk / Return Rank: 22
LSGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
LSGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
LSGR Omega Ratio Rank: 23
LSGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
LSGR Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSGR vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LSGR	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.24	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.77	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.44	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LSGR	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.11	3.63	-2.53

Drawdowns

LSGR vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSGR drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGR and SGRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSGR	SGRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.92%	-17.87%	-5.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.32%	-1.69%	-0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.89%	-3.10%	-0.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.67%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LSGR	SGRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.91%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.42%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.44%	33.40%	-16.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.39%	33.40%	-13.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.39%	33.40%	-13.01%

LSGR vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LSGR and SGRT have an expense ratio of 0.59%.

Dividends

LSGR vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

LSGR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LSGR Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF	0.00%	0.05%	0.08%	0.03%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	0.11%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSGR and SGRT in my portfolio?

LSGR and SGRT have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LSGR or SGRT?

Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LSGR or SGRT?

LSGR and SGRT have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LSGR or SGRT?

SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for LSGR.