LSGGX vs. SSGLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX) and State Street Global All Cap Equity ex-U.S. Index Fund Class K (SSGLX).
LSGGX is managed by Natixis. It was launched on Mar 30, 2016. SSGLX is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI ex USA Investable Market Index. It was launched on Sep 17, 2014.
Performance
LSGGX vs. SSGLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LSGGX vs. SSGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSGGX Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund | -16.35% | 16.84% | 23.30% | 36.10% | -25.98% | 5.89% | 35.25% | 30.63% | -6.70% | 31.11% |
SSGLX State Street Global All Cap Equity ex-U.S. Index Fund Class K | -0.64% | 32.64% | 4.98% | 15.67% | -16.44% | 8.36% | 11.11% | 21.52% | -14.05% | 27.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSGGX achieves a -16.35% return, which is significantly lower than SSGLX's -0.64% return.
LSGGX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -9.84%
- YTD
- -16.35%
- 6M
- -18.90%
- 1Y
- 1.75%
- 3Y*
- 11.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.56%
- 10Y*
- —
SSGLX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -10.87%
- YTD
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 4.10%
- 1Y
- 24.88%
- 3Y*
- 14.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- 8.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LSGGX vs. SSGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSGGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SSGLX's 0.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LSGGX vs. SSGLX — Risk / Return Rank
LSGGX
SSGLX
LSGGX vs. SSGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX) and State Street Global All Cap Equity ex-U.S. Index Fund Class K (SSGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSGGX | SSGLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | 1.56 | -1.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.06 | 2.12 | -2.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.32 | -0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | 2.00 | -2.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | 7.90 | -8.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSGGX | SSGLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | 1.56 | -1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.48 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.37 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between LSGGX and SSGLX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LSGGX vs. SSGLX - Dividend Comparison
LSGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than SSGLX's 4.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSGGX Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund | 0.36% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.77% | 7.38% | 6.15% | 5.74% | 4.78% | 3.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSGLX State Street Global All Cap Equity ex-U.S. Index Fund Class K | 4.44% | 4.41% | 4.46% | 2.98% | 2.85% | 4.20% | 1.72% | 4.80% | 8.32% | 3.98% | 1.52% | 2.09% |
Drawdowns
LSGGX vs. SSGLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSGGX drawdown since its inception was -37.72%, which is greater than SSGLX's maximum drawdown of -35.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGGX and SSGLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSGGX | SSGLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.72% | -35.88% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.08% | -11.22% | -9.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.72% | -30.08% | -7.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.92% | -10.87% | -10.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.55% | -8.32% | +0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.93% | 2.84% | +5.09% |
Volatility
LSGGX vs. SSGLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX) is 5.66%, while State Street Global All Cap Equity ex-U.S. Index Fund Class K (SSGLX) has a volatility of 6.44%. This indicates that LSGGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LSGGX | SSGLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.66% | 6.44% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.86% | 10.02% | +2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.95% | 15.49% | +8.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 14.49% | +7.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 16.15% | +4.42% |