LSGGX vs. NEFFX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

LSGGX (Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund) and NEFFX (American Funds The New Economy Fund® Class F-2) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, LSGGX returned 5.62%/yr vs 12.94%/yr for NEFFX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LSGGX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for NEFFX.

Performance

LSGGX vs. NEFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX) and American Funds The New Economy Fund® Class F-2 (NEFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSGGX achieves a -5.18% return, which is significantly lower than NEFFX's 20.18% return.

LSGGX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 1.62%
• 6M: -8.03%
• YTD: -5.18%
• 1Y: -1.01%
• 3Y*: 13.71%
• 5Y*: 5.62%
• 10Y*: —

NEFFX

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 1.94%
• 6M: 15.07%
• YTD: 20.18%
• 1Y: 41.76%
• 3Y*: 28.83%
• 5Y*: 12.94%
• 10Y*: 16.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSGGX vs. NEFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LSGGX Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund	-5.18%	16.84%	23.30%	36.10%	-25.98%	5.89%	35.25%	30.63%	-6.70%	31.11%
NEFFX American Funds The New Economy Fund® Class F-2	20.18%	31.31%	23.87%	29.47%	-29.50%	12.31%	33.79%	26.75%	-4.17%	34.66%

Correlation

The correlation between LSGGX and NEFFX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between LSGGX and NEFFX has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LSGGX vs. NEFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSGGX

LSGGX Risk / Return Rank: 3
LSGGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
LSGGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
LSGGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
LSGGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
LSGGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

NEFFX

NEFFX Risk / Return Rank: 80
NEFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
NEFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
NEFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
NEFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
NEFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSGGX vs. NEFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX) and American Funds The New Economy Fund® Class F-2 (NEFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LSGGX	NEFFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.06	2.13	-2.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.04	2.74	-2.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.37	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.06	3.10	-3.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.13	13.12	-13.25

LSGGX vs. NEFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSGGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the NEFFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSGGX and NEFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LSGGX vs. NEFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSGGX drawdown since its inception was -37.72%, smaller than the maximum NEFFX drawdown of -45.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGGX and NEFFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSGGX	NEFFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.72%	-45.12%	+7.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.08%	-13.32%	-7.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.21%	-20.78%	-1.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.72%	-36.95%	-0.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.37%	-3.16%	-7.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.65%	-7.58%	-0.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.37%	3.14%	+5.23%

Volatility

LSGGX vs. NEFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX) is 6.31%, while American Funds The New Economy Fund® Class F-2 (NEFFX) has a volatility of 8.53%. This indicates that LSGGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSGGX	NEFFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.31%	8.53%	-2.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.35%	16.15%	-1.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.46%	19.36%	-0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.19%	19.82%	+2.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.55%	19.20%	+1.35%

LSGGX vs. NEFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSGGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NEFFX's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSGGX vs. NEFFX - Dividend Comparison

LSGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than NEFFX's 8.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LSGGX Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund	0.32%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	7.77%	7.38%	6.15%	5.74%	4.78%	3.44%	0.00%	0.00%
NEFFX American Funds The New Economy Fund® Class F-2	8.21%	9.87%	9.61%	4.19%	0.19%	7.55%	2.69%	7.57%	10.31%	8.50%	2.51%	6.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSGGX and NEFFX in my portfolio?

LSGGX and NEFFX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LSGGX or NEFFX?

NEFFX has higher volatility (8.53%) compared to LSGGX (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSGGX dropped -37.72% vs NEFFX's -45.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NEFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.