PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSEQ vs. HTUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LSEQ vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LSEQ vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LSEQ
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
20.53%4.13%12.80%-1.20%
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
-3.85%16.57%25.02%5.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSEQ achieves a 20.53% return, which is significantly higher than HTUS's -3.85% return.


LSEQ

1D
0.81%
1M
-2.60%
YTD
20.53%
6M
20.58%
1Y
17.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HTUS

1D
3.72%
1M
-4.31%
YTD
-3.85%
6M
0.02%
1Y
17.12%
3Y*
18.82%
5Y*
13.40%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LSEQ vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSEQ has a 1.70% expense ratio, which is higher than HTUS's 0.97% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LSEQ vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSEQ
LSEQ Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
LSEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
LSEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

HTUS
HTUS Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HTUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
HTUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSEQ vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSEQHTUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

0.79

+0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.66

1.37

+0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.23

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

0.99

+1.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.60

6.79

-2.19

LSEQ vs. HTUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the HTUS Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSEQ and HTUS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSEQHTUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

0.79

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.51

+0.59

Correlation

The correlation between LSEQ and HTUS is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LSEQ vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison

LSEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than HTUS's 12.37% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LSEQ
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
1.83%2.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
12.37%11.89%17.80%1.18%5.63%7.20%3.77%0.92%8.69%8.29%3.02%

Drawdowns

LSEQ vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSEQ drawdown since its inception was -8.35%, smaller than the maximum HTUS drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSEQ and HTUS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LSEQHTUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.35%

-47.50%

+39.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.40%

-17.90%

+10.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-5.29%

+2.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.34%

-4.11%

+0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

2.61%

+1.47%

Volatility

LSEQ vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) have volatilities of 6.23% and 6.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LSEQHTUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.23%

6.36%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.47%

9.24%

+3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.88%

21.90%

-6.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.23%

18.99%

-4.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.23%

21.38%

-7.15%