LSCIX vs. GFIRX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LSCIX (Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund) and GFIRX (Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - LSCIX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Lord Abbett, while GFIRX is a Systematic Trend fund managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past 5 years, LSCIX returned 2.21%/yr vs 3.79%/yr for GFIRX. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. LSCIX charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for GFIRX.

Performance

LSCIX vs. GFIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund (LSCIX) and Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSCIX achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than GFIRX's 7.48% return.

LSCIX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: 0.34%
• 6M: 0.83%
• 1Y: 3.57%
• 3Y*: 4.89%
• 5Y*: 2.21%
• 10Y*: —

GFIRX

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 7.48%
• 6M: 7.24%
• 1Y: 19.81%
• 3Y*: -0.07%
• 5Y*: 3.79%
• 10Y*: 3.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSCIX vs. GFIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LSCIX Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund	0.34%	5.73%	4.84%	4.78%	-4.20%	0.17%	2.76%	4.99%	1.62%	0.15%
GFIRX Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund	7.48%	0.54%	-5.17%	-3.87%	20.44%	4.86%	6.94%	2.61%	-2.24%	2.96%

Correlation

The correlation between LSCIX and GFIRX is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2017	-0.17

The correlation between LSCIX and GFIRX shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (5 years) to -0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LSCIX vs. GFIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSCIX

LSCIX Risk / Return Rank: 59
LSCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
LSCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
LSCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
LSCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
LSCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

GFIRX

GFIRX Risk / Return Rank: 85
GFIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
GFIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
GFIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
GFIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
GFIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSCIX vs. GFIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund (LSCIX) and Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LSCIX	GFIRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	2.66	-0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.37	3.75	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.50	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	4.30	-1.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.95	13.70	-3.75

LSCIX vs. GFIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the GFIRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSCIX and GFIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LSCIX vs. GFIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSCIX drawdown since its inception was -7.31%, smaller than the maximum GFIRX drawdown of -23.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSCIX and GFIRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSCIX	GFIRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.31%	-23.09%	+15.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.40%	-4.86%	+3.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.40%	-22.39%	+20.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.51%	-23.09%	+16.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-23.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.52%	-5.93%	+5.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.96%	-7.02%	+6.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.37%	1.52%	-1.15%

Volatility

LSCIX vs. GFIRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund (LSCIX) is 0.70%, while Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX) has a volatility of 2.71%. This indicates that LSCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSCIX	GFIRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.70%	2.71%	-2.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.58%	6.33%	-4.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.09%	7.85%	-5.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.28%	10.40%	-8.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.11%	9.08%	-6.97%

LSCIX vs. GFIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSCIX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than GFIRX's 1.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSCIX vs. GFIRX - Dividend Comparison

LSCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, while GFIRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GFIRX Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	20.11%	7.35%	1.21%	7.06%	0.16%	0.49%	0.00%	3.98%
LSCIX Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund	4.64%	4.68%	4.61%	4.08%	2.32%	1.92%	2.49%	3.22%	3.35%	1.16%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSCIX and GFIRX in my portfolio?

LSCIX and GFIRX have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LSCIX or GFIRX?

GFIRX has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to LSCIX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSCIX dropped -7.31% vs GFIRX's -23.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GFIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.