PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSCIX vs. LAVLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSCIX vs. LAVLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund (LSCIX) and Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund (LAVLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSCIX achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than LAVLX's 9.45% return.


LSCIX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.67%
6M
1.05%
1Y
4.14%
3Y*
4.89%
5Y*
2.26%
10Y*

LAVLX

1D
-0.83%
1M
-0.86%
YTD
9.45%
6M
10.46%
1Y
21.93%
3Y*
15.30%
5Y*
7.94%
10Y*
8.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSCIX vs. LAVLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSCIX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund
0.67%5.73%4.84%4.78%-4.20%0.17%2.76%4.99%1.62%0.15%
LAVLX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund
9.45%7.28%14.96%15.50%-11.02%28.79%2.73%22.92%-14.55%3.66%

Correlation

The correlation between LSCIX and LAVLX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2017

0.02

The correlation between LSCIX and LAVLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSCIX vs. LAVLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSCIX
LSCIX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
LSCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
LSCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

LAVLX
LAVLX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
LAVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
LAVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSCIX vs. LAVLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund (LSCIX) and Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund (LAVLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSCIXLAVLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.95

1.82

+0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.76

2.67

+1.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.32

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

2.86

+0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.52

10.54

+1.98

LSCIX vs. LAVLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the LAVLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSCIX and LAVLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSCIXLAVLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

1.82

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.46

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.59

+0.51

Drawdowns

LSCIX vs. LAVLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSCIX drawdown since its inception was -7.31%, smaller than the maximum LAVLX drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSCIX and LAVLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSCIXLAVLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.31%

-60.58%

+53.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.40%

-7.72%

+6.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.40%

-20.91%

+19.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.51%

-21.76%

+15.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-2.12%

+1.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.96%

-8.12%

+7.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

2.09%

-1.73%

Volatility

LSCIX vs. LAVLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund (LSCIX) is 0.69%, while Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund (LAVLX) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that LSCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAVLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSCIXLAVLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

3.52%

-2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.58%

8.98%

-7.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08%

12.30%

-10.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.27%

17.29%

-15.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.11%

19.56%

-17.45%

LSCIX vs. LAVLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSCIX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than LAVLX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSCIX vs. LAVLX - Dividend Comparison

LSCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, less than LAVLX's 6.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LAVLX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund
6.43%7.04%9.70%1.23%8.40%8.51%1.19%3.19%6.55%2.67%0.60%0.79%
LSCIX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund
4.63%4.68%4.61%4.08%2.32%1.92%2.49%3.22%3.35%1.16%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSCIX and LAVLX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAVLX has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to LSCIX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSCIX dropped -7.31% vs LAVLX's -60.58%.

LSCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSCIX and LAVLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer