PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFIRX vs. EVOIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GFIRX vs. EVOIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX) and Winton Managed Futures Trend Fund (EVOIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFIRX achieves a 5.85% return, which is significantly lower than EVOIX's 6.42% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GFIRX having a 2.69% annualized return and EVOIX not far ahead at 2.74%.


GFIRX

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.03%
6M
3.61%
YTD
5.85%
1Y
16.31%
3Y*
-0.47%
5Y*
3.46%
10Y*
2.69%
ALL TIME*
2.31%

EVOIX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.22%
6M
3.11%
YTD
6.42%
1Y
21.44%
3Y*
5.21%
5Y*
6.82%
10Y*
2.74%
ALL TIME*
4.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GFIRX vs. EVOIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GFIRX
Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund
5.85%0.54%-5.17%-3.87%20.44%4.86%6.94%2.61%-2.24%2.56%
EVOIX
Winton Managed Futures Trend Fund
6.42%4.69%3.86%5.03%12.84%12.20%-12.94%4.22%-7.58%9.09%

Correlation

The correlation between GFIRX and EVOIX is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.68

The correlation between GFIRX and EVOIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFIRX vs. EVOIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GFIRX
GFIRX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
GFIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
GFIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

EVOIX
EVOIX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EVOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
EVOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GFIRX vs. EVOIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX) and Winton Managed Futures Trend Fund (EVOIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GFIRXEVOIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.36

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

3.74

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.88

9.51

-0.63

GFIRX vs. EVOIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFIRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the EVOIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFIRX and EVOIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GFIRX vs. EVOIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFIRX drawdown since its inception was -23.09%, smaller than the maximum EVOIX drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFIRX and EVOIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFIRXEVOIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.09%

-29.57%

+6.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.86%

-5.38%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.39%

-18.80%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.09%

-18.80%

-4.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.09%

-29.57%

+6.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.35%

-3.63%

-3.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.02%

-8.11%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

2.11%

-0.45%

Volatility

GFIRX vs. EVOIX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX) has a higher volatility of 2.56% compared to Winton Managed Futures Trend Fund (EVOIX) at 2.02%. This indicates that GFIRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVOIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFIRXEVOIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

2.02%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.89%

7.13%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.47%

10.17%

-1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.44%

9.53%

+0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.11%

10.38%

-1.27%

GFIRX vs. EVOIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFIRX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is lower than EVOIX's 1.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

GFIRX vs. EVOIX - Dividend Comparison

GFIRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EVOIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.16%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EVOIX
Winton Managed Futures Trend Fund
9.16%11.11%10.09%1.71%34.87%9.73%2.23%1.63%5.52%1.57%7.27%9.05%
GFIRX
Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%20.11%7.35%1.21%7.06%0.16%0.49%0.00%3.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


GFIRX and EVOIX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GFIRX has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to EVOIX (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFIRX dropped -23.09% vs EVOIX's -29.57%.

EVOIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFIRX and EVOIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer