PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSCIX vs. DFAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSCIX vs. DFAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund (LSCIX) and DFA Short-Duration Real Return Portfolio (DFAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSCIX achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than DFAIX's 2.57% return.


LSCIX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.67%
6M
1.05%
1Y
4.14%
3Y*
4.89%
5Y*
2.26%
10Y*

DFAIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.56%
YTD
2.57%
6M
2.56%
1Y
4.85%
3Y*
5.79%
5Y*
3.84%
10Y*
3.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSCIX vs. DFAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSCIX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund
0.67%5.73%4.84%4.78%-4.20%0.17%2.76%4.99%1.62%0.15%
DFAIX
DFA Short-Duration Real Return Portfolio
2.57%4.86%6.38%5.64%-2.77%5.40%2.75%5.63%0.11%0.79%

Correlation

The correlation between LSCIX and DFAIX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2017

0.33

The correlation between LSCIX and DFAIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSCIX vs. DFAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSCIX
LSCIX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
LSCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
LSCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAIX
DFAIX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
DFAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSCIX vs. DFAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund (LSCIX) and DFA Short-Duration Real Return Portfolio (DFAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSCIXDFAIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.95

4.44

-2.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.76

7.79

-4.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

2.45

-0.96

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

10.51

-7.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.52

49.27

-36.75

LSCIX vs. DFAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is lower than the DFAIX Sharpe Ratio of 4.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSCIX and DFAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSCIXDFAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

4.44

-2.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

1.22

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

1.13

-0.03

Drawdowns

LSCIX vs. DFAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSCIX drawdown since its inception was -7.31%, which is greater than DFAIX's maximum drawdown of -5.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSCIX and DFAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSCIXDFAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.31%

-5.63%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.40%

-0.47%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.40%

-3.12%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.51%

-5.46%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

0.00%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.96%

-0.94%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.10%

+0.26%

Volatility

LSCIX vs. DFAIX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund (LSCIX) has a higher volatility of 0.69% compared to DFA Short-Duration Real Return Portfolio (DFAIX) at 0.47%. This indicates that LSCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSCIXDFAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

0.47%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.58%

0.93%

+0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08%

1.11%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.27%

3.18%

-0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.11%

2.55%

-0.44%

LSCIX vs. DFAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSCIX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAIX's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSCIX vs. DFAIX - Dividend Comparison

LSCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than DFAIX's 4.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFAIX
DFA Short-Duration Real Return Portfolio
4.54%4.65%4.14%3.66%1.68%0.98%0.82%2.53%2.72%1.71%1.41%1.29%
LSCIX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund
4.63%4.68%4.61%4.08%2.32%1.92%2.49%3.22%3.35%1.16%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSCIX and DFAIX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSCIX has higher volatility (0.69%) compared to DFAIX (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSCIX dropped -7.31% vs DFAIX's -5.63%.

DFAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.44 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSCIX and DFAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer