LSBDX vs. CBLDX
LSBDX (Loomis Sayles Bond Fund) and CBLDX (CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, LSBDX returned 2.24%/yr vs 5.22%/yr for CBLDX. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LSBDX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for CBLDX.
Performance
LSBDX vs. CBLDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSBDX achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly lower than CBLDX's 1.83% return.
LSBDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- -0.19%
- 6M
- 0.13%
- 1Y
- 5.12%
- 3Y*
- 7.01%
- 5Y*
- 2.24%
- 10Y*
- 3.34%
CBLDX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 2.71%
- 1Y
- 5.17%
- 3Y*
- 6.63%
- 5Y*
- 5.22%
- 10Y*
- —
LSBDX vs. CBLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSBDX Loomis Sayles Bond Fund | -0.19% | 8.67% | 6.70% | 8.05% | -12.50% | 3.23% | 2.14% | 11.72% | -3.87% |
CBLDX CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund | 1.83% | 6.04% | 7.11% | 7.71% | 0.66% | 7.44% | 3.59% | 3.50% | 1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSBDX and CBLDX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2018 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSBDX vs. CBLDX — Risk / Return Rank
LSBDX
CBLDX
LSBDX vs. CBLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX) and CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSBDX | CBLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.79 | 3.81 | -2.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.70 | 5.67 | -2.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 2.20 | -0.85 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 7.29 | -5.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.36 | 29.04 | -22.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSBDX | CBLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 3.81 | -2.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 3.30 | -2.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.41 | 2.60 | -1.19 |
Drawdowns
LSBDX vs. CBLDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSBDX drawdown since its inception was -30.58%, which is greater than CBLDX's maximum drawdown of -8.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSBDX and CBLDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSBDX | CBLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.58% | -8.15% | -22.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.25% | -0.73% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.55% | -1.05% | -4.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.60% | -1.88% | -14.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | 0.00% | -1.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.80% | -0.31% | -2.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 0.18% | +0.80% |
Volatility
LSBDX vs. CBLDX - Volatility Comparison
Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX) at 0.31%. This indicates that LSBDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSBDX | CBLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | 0.31% | +0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.58% | 1.13% | +1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.44% | 1.39% | +2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.01% | 1.59% | +3.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.88% | 1.82% | +3.06% |
LSBDX vs. CBLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSBDX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than CBLDX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
LSBDX vs. CBLDX - Dividend Comparison
LSBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than CBLDX's 6.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBLDX CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund | 6.22% | 6.43% | 7.12% | 7.65% | 5.07% | 5.13% | 3.97% | 2.85% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LSBDX Loomis Sayles Bond Fund | 3.87% | 4.15% | 5.51% | 5.09% | 5.13% | 2.88% | 3.83% | 3.97% | 3.78% | 5.86% | 3.13% | 7.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSBDX and CBLDX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LSBDX has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to CBLDX (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSBDX dropped -30.58% vs CBLDX's -8.15%.
CBLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.81 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSBDX and CBLDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer