LSAT vs. MMKT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT).

LSAT and MMKT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LSAT is an actively managed fund by Redwood. It was launched on Oct 27, 2020. MMKT is an actively managed fund by Texas Capital. It was launched on Sep 24, 2024.

Performance

LSAT vs. MMKT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LSAT vs. MMKT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LSAT Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF	1.40%	-1.54%	-0.83%
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF	0.84%	4.13%	1.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSAT achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly higher than MMKT's 0.84% return.

LSAT

• 1D: 1.77%
• 1M: -1.78%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 6M: -2.97%
• 1Y: 0.13%
• 3Y*: 9.21%
• 5Y*: 5.57%
• 10Y*: —

MMKT

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 0.84%
• 6M: 1.81%
• 1Y: 3.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSAT vs. MMKT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSAT has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MMKT's 0.20% expense ratio.

LSAT

Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF

MMKT

Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF

Return for Risk

LSAT vs. MMKT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSAT

LSAT Risk / Return Rank: 12
LSAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
LSAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
LSAT Omega Ratio Rank: 12
LSAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
LSAT Martin Ratio Rank: 13

MMKT

MMKT Risk / Return Rank: 100
MMKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MMKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
MMKT Omega Ratio Rank: 100
MMKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MMKT Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSAT vs. MMKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LSAT	MMKT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.01	15.67	-15.66
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.13	51.57	-51.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	12.51	-11.49
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.07	93.84	-93.78
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.21	761.18	-760.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LSAT vs. MMKT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the MMKT Sharpe Ratio of 15.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSAT and MMKT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LSAT	MMKT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01	15.67	-15.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	17.44	-16.79

Correlation

The correlation between LSAT and MMKT is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LSAT vs. MMKT - Dividend Comparison

LSAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than MMKT's 3.85% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
LSAT Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF	1.87%	1.90%	1.31%	1.85%	0.36%	3.44%	0.30%
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF	3.85%	3.98%	1.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

LSAT vs. MMKT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSAT drawdown since its inception was -20.48%, which is greater than MMKT's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSAT and MMKT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSAT	MMKT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.48%	-0.04%	-20.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.54%	-0.04%	-13.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.77%	0.00%	-6.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.68%	0.00%	-5.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.22%	0.01%	+4.21%

Volatility

LSAT vs. MMKT - Volatility Comparison

Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) at 0.08%. This indicates that LSAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSAT	MMKT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	0.08%	+3.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.35%	0.16%	+9.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.26%	0.25%	+17.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.28%	0.24%	+16.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.90%	0.24%	+16.66%