LRSCX vs. LGLIX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

LRSCX (Lord Abbett Small Cap Value Fund) and LGLIX (Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund) are both mutual funds - LRSCX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Lord Abbett, while LGLIX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Lord Abbett. Over the past 10 years, LRSCX returned 7.14%/yr vs 18.18%/yr for LGLIX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LRSCX charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for LGLIX.

Performance

LRSCX vs. LGLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Small Cap Value Fund (LRSCX) and Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LRSCX having a 10.76% return and LGLIX slightly lower at 10.33%. Over the past 10 years, LRSCX has underperformed LGLIX with an annualized return of 7.14%, while LGLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.18% annualized return.

LRSCX

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: -1.72%
• YTD: 10.76%
• 6M: 11.95%
• 1Y: 23.93%
• 3Y*: 12.01%
• 5Y*: 4.46%
• 10Y*: 7.14%

LGLIX

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 7.25%
• YTD: 10.33%
• 6M: 9.17%
• 1Y: 27.12%
• 3Y*: 28.63%
• 5Y*: 11.30%
• 10Y*: 18.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRSCX vs. LGLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LRSCX Lord Abbett Small Cap Value Fund	10.76%	0.61%	12.66%	19.81%	-17.48%	26.24%	-1.49%	20.41%	-11.90%	6.49%
LGLIX Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund	10.33%	16.49%	44.97%	33.29%	-38.73%	8.62%	77.55%	35.02%	-1.08%	31.64%

Correlation

The correlation between LRSCX and LGLIX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2011	0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between LRSCX and LGLIX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LRSCX vs. LGLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRSCX

LRSCX Risk / Return Rank: 25
LRSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
LRSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
LRSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
LRSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
LRSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

LGLIX

LGLIX Risk / Return Rank: 18
LGLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
LGLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
LGLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
LGLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
LGLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRSCX vs. LGLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Small Cap Value Fund (LRSCX) and Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LRSCX	LGLIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	1.36	+0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	1.84	+0.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.24	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	1.40	+0.65
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.42	4.04	+2.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LRSCX vs. LGLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the LGLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRSCX and LGLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LRSCX	LGLIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38	1.36	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	0.44	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31	0.74	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.70	-0.22

Drawdowns

LRSCX vs. LGLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRSCX drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, which is greater than LGLIX's maximum drawdown of -45.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRSCX and LGLIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRSCX	LGLIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.02%	-45.95%	-8.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.18%	-21.01%	+9.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.24%	-29.25%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.24%	-45.95%	+16.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.25%	-45.95%	-4.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.10%	0.00%	-3.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.77%	-9.34%	+0.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.57%	7.27%	-3.70%

Volatility

LRSCX vs. LGLIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Small Cap Value Fund (LRSCX) is 4.83%, while Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) has a volatility of 5.23%. This indicates that LRSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LRSCX	LGLIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.83%	5.23%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.62%	15.74%	-4.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.29%	21.12%	-3.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.35%	25.84%	-4.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.35%	24.79%	-1.44%

LRSCX vs. LGLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRSCX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than LGLIX's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRSCX vs. LGLIX - Dividend Comparison

LRSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.03%, more than LGLIX's 1.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LGLIX Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund	1.81%	1.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	23.83%	9.27%	8.01%	19.82%	6.46%	0.00%	4.84%
LRSCX Lord Abbett Small Cap Value Fund	6.03%	6.68%	11.06%	0.12%	3.79%	17.08%	1.06%	19.56%	20.44%	14.33%	14.14%	24.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRSCX and LGLIX in my portfolio?

LRSCX and LGLIX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LRSCX or LGLIX?

LGLIX has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to LRSCX (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRSCX dropped -54.02% vs LGLIX's -45.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LRSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.