LRND vs. QUS
LRND (IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF) and QUS (State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - LRND tracks the IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross while QUS tracks the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LRND returned 21.92%/yr vs 17.10%/yr for QUS. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LRND charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUS.
Performance
LRND vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRND achieves a 12.76% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 10.23% return.
LRND
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- 6M
- 12.78%
- YTD
- 12.76%
- 1Y
- 26.47%
- 3Y*
- 21.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.66%
QUS
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 7.60%
- YTD
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 19.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.10%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 13.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $19.34K | $1.86M | $1.87M | |
| $3.01M | $4.81M | $3.43M |
LRND vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRND IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF | 12.76% | 20.31% | 21.68% | 44.13% | -19.33% |
QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 10.23% | 14.13% | 18.99% | 21.78% | -8.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRND and QUS is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2022 | 0.85 |
The correlation between LRND and QUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LRND vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LRND
QUS
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Real Estate
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
LRND
QUS
Communication Services
LRND
QUS
Healthcare
LRND
QUS
Consumer Cyclical
LRND
QUS
Industrials
LRND
QUS
Consumer Defensive
LRND
QUS
Basic Materials
LRND
QUS
Financial Services
LRND
QUS
Real Estate
LRND
QUS
Energy
LRND
-
QUS
Utilities
LRND
-
QUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRND vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank
LRND
QUS
LRND vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND) and State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRND | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.39 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 2.90 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.83 | 12.95 | -6.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRND vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRND drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, smaller than the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRND and QUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRND | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.43% | -33.78% | +8.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.83% | -6.85% | -6.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.06% | -13.94% | -7.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | 0.00% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.16% | -3.66% | -2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | 1.53% | +2.36% |
Volatility
LRND vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 2.42%. This indicates that LRND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRND | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 2.42% | +2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.48% | 6.97% | +6.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.71% | 9.22% | +7.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.99% | 14.32% | +5.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.99% | 16.40% | +3.59% |
LRND vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRND has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LRND vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
LRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than QUS's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRND IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF | 0.41% | 0.67% | 0.97% | 1.22% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.27% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LRND and QUS have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LRND has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to QUS (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRND dropped -25.43% vs QUS's -33.78%.
On 3-year performance, LRND leads with 21.92% vs 17.10% for QUS. On fees, LRND is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, LRND has performed better with a 21.92% return vs 17.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LRND is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QUS.
QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.41% for LRND.
LRND tracks IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: IndexIQ and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for LRND and 0.15% for QUS.
QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LRND and QUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer