PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRN vs. HCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LRN vs. HCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stride, Inc. (LRN) and HCI Group, Inc. (HCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRN achieves a 50.49% return, which is significantly higher than HCI's -15.87% return. Over the past 10 years, LRN has outperformed HCI with an annualized return of 23.80%, while HCI has yielded a comparatively lower 21.75% annualized return.


LRN

1D
-1.77%
1M
10.87%
YTD
50.49%
6M
51.49%
1Y
-31.17%
3Y*
33.90%
5Y*
26.27%
10Y*
23.80%

HCI

1D
-1.03%
1M
4.62%
YTD
-15.87%
6M
-13.97%
1Y
2.02%
3Y*
42.68%
5Y*
14.15%
10Y*
21.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRN vs. HCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LRN
Stride, Inc.
50.49%-37.53%75.05%89.80%-6.15%56.99%4.32%-17.91%55.91%-7.34%
HCI
HCI Group, Inc.
-15.87%66.27%35.46%126.76%-51.20%62.74%18.45%-6.80%75.98%-21.53%

Correlation

The correlation between LRN and HCI is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2008

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LRN:

$4.65B

HCI:

$2.07B

EPS

LRN:

$9.68

HCI:

$24.40

PE Ratio

LRN:

10.10

HCI:

6.58

PEG Ratio

LRN:

0.25

HCI:

0.01

PS Ratio

LRN:

1.86

HCI:

2.23

PB Ratio

LRN:

2.83

HCI:

1.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

LRN:

$2.54B

HCI:

$927.48M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LRN:

$972.24M

HCI:

$617.14M

EBITDA (TTM)

LRN:

$424.60M

HCI:

$459.34M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LRN vs. HCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRN
LRN Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
LRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRN Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
LRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRN Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

HCI
HCI Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
HCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCI Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
HCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCI Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRN vs. HCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stride, Inc. (LRN) and HCI Group, Inc. (HCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LRNHCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.04

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

0.07

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.74

0.13

-0.87

LRN vs. HCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRN Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the HCI Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRN and HCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LRN vs. HCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRN drawdown since its inception was -81.41%, roughly equal to the maximum HCI drawdown of -78.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRN and HCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LRNHCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.41%

-78.79%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.07%

-27.46%

-36.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.07%

-28.30%

-35.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.07%

-78.79%

+14.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.07%

-78.79%

+14.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.46%

-21.68%

-20.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.27%

-20.67%

-15.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.11%

16.31%

+25.80%

Volatility

LRN vs. HCI - Volatility Comparison

Stride, Inc. (LRN) has a higher volatility of 8.21% compared to HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) at 7.53%. This indicates that LRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LRNHCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.21%

7.53%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.17%

21.38%

+2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.70%

31.83%

+34.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.40%

43.03%

+8.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.22%

41.57%

+7.65%

Dividends

LRN vs. HCI - Dividend Comparison

LRN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HCI
HCI Group, Inc.
1.00%0.83%1.37%1.83%4.04%1.92%3.06%3.50%2.90%4.68%3.04%3.44%
LRN
Stride, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LRN vs. HCI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stride, Inc. and HCI Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M20222023202420252026
629.87M
242.88M
(LRN) Total Revenue
(HCI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LRN vs. HCI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Stride, Inc. and HCI Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
36.8%
73.0%
Portfolio components
LRN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a gross profit of 231.56M and revenue of 629.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

HCI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HCI Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 177.28M and revenue of 242.88M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.0%.

LRN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported an operating income of 129.08M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.

HCI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HCI Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 115.38M and revenue of 242.88M, resulting in an operating margin of 47.5%.

LRN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a net income of 248.49M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.5%.

HCI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HCI Group, Inc. reported a net income of 85.04M and revenue of 242.88M, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LRN and HCI have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LRN has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to HCI (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRN dropped -81.41% vs HCI's -78.79%.

HCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.06 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRN and HCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer