LRGF vs. USOY

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

LRGF (iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF) and USOY (Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LRGF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Diversified Multi-Factor, while USOY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance. LRGF is passively managed, while USOY is actively managed. Over the past year, LRGF returned 26.79% vs 55.52% for USOY. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. LRGF charges 0.20%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for USOY.

Performance

LRGF vs. USOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRGF achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly lower than USOY's 59.86% return.

LRGF

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 6.67%
• YTD: 11.29%
• 6M: 11.73%
• 1Y: 26.79%
• 3Y*: 23.10%
• 5Y*: 14.20%
• 10Y*: 14.11%

USOY

• 1D: 1.63%
• 1M: -1.93%
• YTD: 59.86%
• 6M: 58.33%
• 1Y: 55.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRGF vs. USOY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF	11.29%	16.48%	13.73%
USOY Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF	59.86%	-7.93%	7.27%

Correlation

The correlation between LRGF and USOY is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2024	-0.07

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between LRGF and USOY has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.07 to -0.29, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Return for Risk

LRGF vs. USOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRGF

LRGF Risk / Return Rank: 65
LRGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
LRGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
LRGF Omega Ratio Rank: 65
LRGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
LRGF Martin Ratio Rank: 68

USOY

USOY Risk / Return Rank: 56
USOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
USOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
USOY Omega Ratio Rank: 54
USOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
USOY Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRGF vs. USOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LRGF	USOY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	1.83	+0.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	2.25	+0.82
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.34	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	4.10	-1.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.80	7.91	+4.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LRGF vs. USOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRGF Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the USOY Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRGF and USOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LRGF	USOY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	1.83	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.96	-0.26

Drawdowns

LRGF vs. USOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRGF drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, which is greater than USOY's maximum drawdown of -17.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGF and USOY.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRGF	USOY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.03%	-17.46%	-18.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.92%	-14.29%	+5.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.44%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-6.47%	+6.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.54%	-6.47%	+1.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	7.42%	-5.28%

Volatility

LRGF vs. USOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) is 2.79%, while Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) has a volatility of 11.94%. This indicates that LRGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LRGF	USOY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.79%	11.94%	-9.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.07%	27.16%	-18.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.04%	30.46%	-18.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.02%	26.14%	-9.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.31%	26.14%	-7.83%

LRGF vs. USOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRGF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than USOY's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRGF vs. USOY - Dividend Comparison

LRGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than USOY's 54.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF	1.05%	1.16%	1.23%	1.49%	1.78%	1.05%	1.35%	1.76%	3.27%	1.68%	1.56%	0.83%
USOY Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF	54.95%	104.32%	48.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRGF and USOY in my portfolio?

LRGF and USOY have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LRGF or USOY?

USOY has higher volatility (11.94%) compared to LRGF (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRGF dropped -36.03% vs USOY's -17.46%.

Which ETF is better, LRGF or USOY?

On 1-year performance, USOY leads with 55.52% vs 26.79% for LRGF. On fees, LRGF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, LRGF has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LRGF or USOY?

Over the 1-year period, USOY has performed better with a 55.52% return vs 26.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LRGF or USOY?

LRGF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for USOY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LRGF or USOY?

USOY has the higher dividend yield at 54.95%, compared with 1.05% for LRGF.

What is the main difference between LRGF and USOY?

LRGF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while USOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LRGF and 1.22% for USOY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LRGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.