LRGC vs. VTI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LRGC (AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. LRGC is actively managed, while VTI is passively managed. Over the past year, LRGC returned 23.67% vs 28.18% for VTI. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LRGC charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.

Performance

LRGC vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRGC achieves a 7.44% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.20% return.

LRGC

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 3.05%
• YTD: 7.44%
• 6M: 7.71%
• 1Y: 23.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VTI

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 4.99%
• YTD: 11.20%
• 6M: 11.09%
• 1Y: 28.18%
• 3Y*: 22.07%
• 5Y*: 12.69%
• 10Y*: 15.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRGC vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LRGC AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF	7.44%	16.23%	24.92%	9.30%
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	11.20%	17.10%	23.81%	9.41%

Correlation

The correlation between LRGC and VTI is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023	0.95

The correlation between LRGC and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

LRGC vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LRGC	VTI
Technology	34.0%	33.5%
Communication Services	13.2%	10.3%
Financial Services	12.9%	12.0%
Industrials	8.9%	9.8%
Healthcare	8.8%	9.2%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	10.0%
Utilities	3.4%	2.3%
Energy	2.8%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	4.7%
Basic Materials	2.1%	2.0%
Real Estate	1.5%	2.4%

Return for Risk

LRGC vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRGC

LRGC Risk / Return Rank: 57
LRGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
LRGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
LRGC Omega Ratio Rank: 59
LRGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
LRGC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

VTI

VTI Risk / Return Rank: 68
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRGC vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LRGC	VTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	2.33	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	3.18	-0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.42	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	3.17	-0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.89	14.62	-4.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LRGC vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRGC Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRGC and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LRGC	VTI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	2.33	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.45	0.51	+0.94

Drawdowns

LRGC vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRGC drawdown since its inception was -19.38%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGC and VTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRGC	VTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.38%	-55.45%	+36.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.00%	-8.92%	-1.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.30%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-0.72%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.15%	-8.03%	+5.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.40%	1.93%	+0.47%

Volatility

LRGC vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) have volatilities of 2.91% and 2.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LRGC	VTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.91%	2.96%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.09%	9.13%	-0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.88%	12.17%	-0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.20%	17.40%	-2.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.20%	18.30%	-3.10%

LRGC vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRGC has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRGC vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

LRGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than VTI's 1.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LRGC AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF	0.54%	0.58%	0.46%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	1.01%	1.12%	1.27%	1.44%	1.66%	1.21%	1.42%	1.78%	2.04%	1.71%	1.92%	1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRGC and VTI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, LRGC and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LRGC or VTI?

VTI has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to LRGC (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRGC dropped -19.38% vs VTI's -55.45%.

Which ETF is better, LRGC or VTI?

On 1-year performance, VTI leads with 28.18% vs 23.67% for LRGC. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LRGC or VTI?

Over the 1-year period, VTI has performed better with a 28.18% return vs 23.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LRGC or VTI?

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for LRGC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LRGC or VTI?

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.54% for LRGC.

What is the main difference between LRGC and VTI?

They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for LRGC and 0.03% for VTI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.