LRGC vs. BUFX

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

LRGC (AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF) and BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LRGC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. Over the past year, LRGC returned 18.28% vs 9.47% for BUFX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LRGC charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BUFX.

Performance

LRGC vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRGC achieves a 9.26% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 4.76% return.

LRGC

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 3.12%
• 6M: 7.48%
• YTD: 9.26%
• 1Y: 18.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BUFX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.86%
• 6M: 4.31%
• YTD: 4.76%
• 1Y: 9.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRGC vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LRGC AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF	9.26%	11.93%
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF	4.76%	5.43%

Correlation

The correlation between LRGC and BUFX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	0.89

The correlation between LRGC and BUFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LRGC vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRGC

LRGC Risk / Return Rank: 51
LRGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
LRGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
LRGC Omega Ratio Rank: 53
LRGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
LRGC Martin Ratio Rank: 55

BUFX

BUFX Risk / Return Rank: 90
BUFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
BUFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
BUFX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
BUFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
BUFX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRGC vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LRGC	BUFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	2.37	-0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	3.72	-1.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.52	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	3.31	-1.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.47	19.50	-12.02

LRGC vs. BUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRGC Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the BUFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRGC and BUFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LRGC vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRGC drawdown since its inception was -19.38%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGC and BUFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRGC	BUFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.38%	-2.87%	-16.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.00%	-2.87%	-7.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	-0.02%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.16%	-0.24%	-1.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.45%	0.49%	+1.96%

Volatility

LRGC vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) at 0.96%. This indicates that LRGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LRGC	BUFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.28%	0.96%	+2.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.82%	3.39%	+6.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.40%	4.02%	+8.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.17%	3.97%	+11.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.17%	3.97%	+11.20%

LRGC vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRGC has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRGC vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison

LRGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LRGC AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF	0.53%	0.58%	0.46%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRGC and BUFX in my portfolio?

LRGC and BUFX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LRGC or BUFX?

LRGC has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to BUFX (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRGC dropped -19.38% vs BUFX's -2.87%.

Which ETF is better, LRGC or BUFX?

On 1-year performance, LRGC leads with 18.28% vs 9.47% for BUFX. On fees, LRGC is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, BUFX has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LRGC or BUFX?

Over the 1-year period, LRGC has performed better with a 18.28% return vs 9.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LRGC or BUFX?

LRGC is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LRGC or BUFX?

LRGC has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.

What is the main difference between LRGC and BUFX?

LRGC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for LRGC and 0.96% for BUFX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BUFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.