PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRCX vs. MRVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LRCX vs. MRVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRCX achieves a 89.76% return, which is significantly lower than MRVL's 240.32% return. Over the past 10 years, LRCX has outperformed MRVL with an annualized return of 46.35%, while MRVL has yielded a comparatively lower 41.26% annualized return.


LRCX

1D
6.98%
1M
10.34%
YTD
89.76%
6M
99.61%
1Y
278.49%
3Y*
76.58%
5Y*
40.10%
10Y*
46.35%

MRVL

1D
9.63%
1M
69.78%
YTD
240.32%
6M
214.35%
1Y
323.75%
3Y*
69.41%
5Y*
42.37%
10Y*
41.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRCX vs. MRVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
89.76%139.16%-6.84%88.63%-40.72%53.66%64.18%119.33%-24.40%76.21%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
240.32%-22.82%83.79%63.68%-57.48%84.62%80.25%65.74%-23.62%56.89%

Correlation

The correlation between LRCX and MRVL is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2000

0.57

The correlation between LRCX and MRVL shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LRCX:

$409.71B

MRVL:

$258.03B

EPS

LRCX:

$5.29

MRVL:

$2.90

PE Ratio

LRCX:

61.36

MRVL:

99.74

PEG Ratio

LRCX:

4.64

MRVL:

0.18

PS Ratio

LRCX:

18.98

MRVL:

28.91

PB Ratio

LRCX:

38.71

MRVL:

14.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

LRCX:

$21.68B

MRVL:

$8.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LRCX:

$10.84B

MRVL:

$4.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

LRCX:

$6.10B

MRVL:

$4.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LRCX vs. MRVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRCX
LRCX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
LRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
LRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

MRVL
MRVL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
MRVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRVL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MRVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRVL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRCX vs. MRVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LRCXMRVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.59

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

14.02

12.37

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

47.19

28.64

+18.54

LRCX vs. MRVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRCX Sharpe Ratio is 5.46, which is comparable to the MRVL Sharpe Ratio of 4.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRCX and MRVL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LRCXMRVLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.46

4.70

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.69

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

0.80

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.23

+0.20

Drawdowns

LRCX vs. MRVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.90%, roughly equal to the maximum MRVL drawdown of -91.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and MRVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LRCXMRVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.90%

-91.60%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.01%

-26.36%

+6.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.10%

-60.79%

+13.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.39%

-61.88%

+5.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.39%

-61.88%

+5.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.60%

-8.72%

+3.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.18%

-46.77%

+18.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.93%

11.37%

-5.44%

Volatility

LRCX vs. MRVL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) is 18.51%, while Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a volatility of 38.50%. This indicates that LRCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LRCXMRVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.51%

38.50%

-19.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.13%

54.32%

-12.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.52%

69.56%

-18.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.25%

61.51%

-15.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.76%

51.77%

-7.01%

Dividends

LRCX vs. MRVL - Dividend Comparison

LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, more than MRVL's 0.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
0.31%0.57%1.19%0.95%1.53%0.78%1.04%1.54%2.79%1.01%1.28%1.36%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
0.08%0.28%0.22%0.40%0.65%0.21%0.50%0.90%1.48%1.12%1.73%2.72%

Financials

LRCX vs. MRVL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lam Research Corporation and Marvell Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
5.84B
2.42B
(LRCX) Total Revenue
(MRVL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LRCX vs. MRVL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lam Research Corporation and Marvell Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%20222023202420252026
49.8%
52.2%
Portfolio components
LRCX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.91B and revenue of 5.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.8%.

MRVL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.

LRCX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.

MRVL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

LRCX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.

MRVL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LRCX and MRVL have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRVL has higher volatility (38.50%) compared to LRCX (18.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRCX dropped -87.90% vs MRVL's -91.60%.

LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.46 vs 4.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRCX and MRVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer