LRCX vs. ATEYY
LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) and ATEYY (Advantest Corp DRC) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 10 years, LRCX returned 48.23%/yr vs 52.65%/yr for ATEYY. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LRCX vs. ATEYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCX achieves a 114.54% return, which is significantly higher than ATEYY's 38.53% return. Over the past 10 years, LRCX has underperformed ATEYY with an annualized return of 48.23%, while ATEYY has yielded a comparatively higher 52.65% annualized return.
LRCX
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 24.16%
- YTD
- 114.54%
- 6M
- 128.79%
- 1Y
- 303.12%
- 3Y*
- 81.91%
- 5Y*
- 43.22%
- 10Y*
- 48.23%
ATEYY
- 1D
- 4.13%
- 1M
- -3.29%
- YTD
- 38.53%
- 6M
- 38.14%
- 1Y
- 200.38%
- 3Y*
- 71.51%
- 5Y*
- 50.50%
- 10Y*
- 52.65%
LRCX vs. ATEYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 114.54% | 139.16% | -6.84% | 88.63% | -40.72% | 53.66% | 64.18% | 119.33% | -24.40% | 76.21% |
ATEYY Advantest Corp DRC | 38.53% | 122.70% | 68.99% | 111.43% | -33.43% | 27.37% | 30.96% | 176.84% | 12.51% | 12.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCX and ATEYY is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.40 |
The correlation between LRCX and ATEYY shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LRCX:
$463.20B
ATEYY:
$127.67B
LRCX:
$5.29
ATEYY:
¥520.21
LRCX:
69.37
ATEYY:
53.89
LRCX:
5.25
ATEYY:
0.69
LRCX:
21.46
ATEYY:
17.92
LRCX:
43.76
ATEYY:
25.59
LRCX:
$21.68B
ATEYY:
¥1.14T
LRCX:
$10.84B
ATEYY:
¥736.09B
LRCX:
$6.10B
ATEYY:
¥533.69B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRCX vs. ATEYY — Risk / Return Rank
LRCX
ATEYY
LRCX vs. ATEYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and Advantest Corp DRC (ATEYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRCX | ATEYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.39 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.26 | 6.07 | +9.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 51.20 | 16.34 | +34.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRCX vs. ATEYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.90%, which is greater than ATEYY's maximum drawdown of -56.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and ATEYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCX | ATEYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.90% | -56.48% | -31.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.01% | -33.24% | +13.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.10% | -44.70% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.39% | -56.48% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.39% | -56.48% | +0.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -11.76% | +11.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.17% | -14.23% | -13.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.95% | 12.32% | -6.37% |
Volatility
LRCX vs. ATEYY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) is 21.52%, while Advantest Corp DRC (ATEYY) has a volatility of 27.35%. This indicates that LRCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATEYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRCX | ATEYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.52% | 27.35% | -5.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.63% | 55.16% | -11.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.78% | 70.37% | -17.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.57% | 53.29% | -6.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.92% | 48.58% | -3.66% |
Dividends
LRCX vs. ATEYY - Dividend Comparison
LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, while ATEYY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATEYY Advantest Corp DRC | 0.00% | 0.11% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.18% | 1.24% | 0.00% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.28% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
Financials
LRCX vs. ATEYY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lam Research Corporation and Advantest Corp DRC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LRCX vs. ATEYY - Profitability Comparison
LRCX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.91B and revenue of 5.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.8%.
ATEYY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Advantest Corp DRC reported a gross profit of 225.18B and revenue of 334.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.4%.
LRCX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.
ATEYY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Advantest Corp DRC reported an operating income of 156.38B and revenue of 334.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.8%.
LRCX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.
ATEYY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Advantest Corp DRC reported a net income of 129.16B and revenue of 334.10B, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCX and ATEYY have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATEYY has higher volatility (27.35%) compared to LRCX (21.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRCX dropped -87.90% vs ATEYY's -56.48%.
LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.79 vs 2.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LRCX and ATEYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer