PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRCU vs. WTIU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LRCU vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 216.82% return, which is significantly higher than WTIU's 84.16% return.


LRCU

1D
11.16%
1M
63.66%
YTD
216.82%
6M
265.53%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WTIU

1D
2.52%
1M
-7.88%
YTD
84.16%
6M
66.93%
1Y
103.84%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRCU vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
LRCU
Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF
216.82%162.61%
WTIU
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN
84.16%5.04%

Correlation

The correlation between LRCU and WTIU is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025

-0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LRCU vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRCU

WTIU
WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRCU vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LRCU vs. WTIU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LRCUWTIUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

12.83

-0.11

+12.94

Drawdowns

LRCU vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, smaller than the maximum WTIU drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and WTIU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LRCUWTIUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.09%

-75.73%

+35.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-34.72%

+34.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-39.19%

+29.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.74%

Volatility

LRCU vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LRCUWTIUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

109.64%

67.49%

+42.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

109.64%

70.62%

+39.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

109.64%

70.62%

+39.02%

LRCU vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

LRCU vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison

Neither LRCU nor WTIU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LRCU and WTIU have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WTIU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WTIU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.

LRCU and WTIU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LRCU and 0.95% for WTIU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRCU and WTIU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer