LRCU vs. QTJL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LRCU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.

Performance

LRCU vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 270.56% return, which is significantly higher than QTJL's 7.38% return.

LRCU

• 1D: -18.44%
• 1M: 38.68%
• YTD: 270.56%
• 6M: 254.04%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTJL

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 7.38%
• 6M: 6.82%
• 1Y: 18.59%
• 3Y*: 19.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRCU vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	270.56%	172.36%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	7.38%	5.63%

Correlation

The correlation between LRCU and QTJL is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025	0.62

Return for Risk

LRCU vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRCU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 67
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 71
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRCU vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LRCU	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.89	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.70	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.39	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.79	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	14.72	—

Drawdowns

LRCU vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and QTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRCU	QTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.09%	-33.40%	-6.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.68%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.44%	-0.04%	-18.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.25%	-7.85%	-1.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.27%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LRCU	QTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.60%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.42%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	116.41%	9.88%	+106.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	116.41%	20.31%	+96.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	116.41%	20.31%	+96.10%

LRCU vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRCU vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither LRCU nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRCU and QTJL in my portfolio?

LRCU and QTJL have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LRCU or QTJL?

On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LRCU or QTJL?

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LRCU or QTJL?

LRCU and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between LRCU and QTJL?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LRCU and 0.79% for QTJL.