LRCU vs. NRGU
Compare and contrast key facts about Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU).
LRCU and NRGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LRCU is an actively managed fund by Tradr. It was launched on Aug 18, 2025. NRGU is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). It was launched on Apr 9, 2019.
Performance
LRCU vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LRCU vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 48.62% | 162.61% |
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 139.49% | 1.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 48.62% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 139.49% return.
LRCU
- 1D
- 7.79%
- 1M
- -12.02%
- YTD
- 48.62%
- 6M
- 97.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NRGU
- 1D
- -10.75%
- 1M
- 24.81%
- YTD
- 139.49%
- 6M
- 107.68%
- 1Y
- 69.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LRCU vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LRCU vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank
LRCU
NRGU
LRCU vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LRCU | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 7.42 | 0.61 | +6.80 |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCU and NRGU is -0.14. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
LRCU vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison
Neither LRCU nor NRGU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
LRCU vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, smaller than the maximum NRGU drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and NRGU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCU | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.09% | -57.50% | +17.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -55.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.64% | -17.40% | -9.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.00% | -25.38% | +15.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 27.12% | — |
Volatility
LRCU vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LRCU | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 23.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 50.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 110.26% | 88.18% | +22.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.26% | 87.12% | +23.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.26% | 87.12% | +23.14% |