LRCU vs. IDV
LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) and IDV (iShares International Select Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LRCU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while IDV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend. LRCU is actively managed, while IDV is passively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LRCU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for IDV.
Performance
LRCU vs. IDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 268.21% return, which is significantly higher than IDV's 13.60% return.
LRCU
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 57.23%
- YTD
- 268.21%
- 6M
- 315.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDV
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 15.83%
- 1Y
- 36.40%
- 3Y*
- 25.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.92%
LRCU vs. IDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 268.21% | 172.36% |
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 13.60% | 10.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCU and IDV is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRCU vs. IDV — Risk / Return Rank
LRCU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IDV
LRCU vs. IDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRCU | IDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.49 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.32 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRCU vs. IDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, smaller than the maximum IDV drawdown of -70.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and IDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCU | IDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.09% | -70.14% | +30.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.70% | +1.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.34% | -15.38% | +6.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.30% | — |
Volatility
LRCU vs. IDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRCU | IDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 113.97% | 13.10% | +100.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 113.97% | 15.58% | +98.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 113.97% | 17.92% | +96.05% |
LRCU vs. IDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IDV's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRCU vs. IDV - Dividend Comparison
LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 4.40% | 4.94% | 6.46% | 6.51% | 7.33% | 5.78% | 5.47% | 5.15% | 5.93% | 4.52% | 4.69% | 5.08% |
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCU and IDV have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.
IDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.
LRCU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IDV is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LRCU and 0.49% for IDV.
Find the right allocation for LRCU and IDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer