LQTI vs. AMDW
LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LQTI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDW.
Performance
LQTI vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQTI achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 181.24% return.
LQTI
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- 6M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDW
- 1D
- -3.92%
- 1M
- -4.60%
- 6M
- 168.13%
- YTD
- 181.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | -0.24% | 3.76% |
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 181.24% | 36.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQTI and AMDW is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQTI vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank
LQTI
AMDW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LQTI vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LQTI | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.60 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LQTI vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQTI drawdown since its inception was -3.41%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQTI and AMDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQTI | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.41% | -34.64% | +31.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -10.40% | +8.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.92% | -13.84% | +12.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | — | — |
Volatility
LQTI vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQTI | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.15% | 83.47% | -78.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.92% | 83.47% | -77.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.92% | 83.47% | -77.55% |
LQTI vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQTI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
LQTI vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison
LQTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.20%, less than AMDW's 42.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 42.69% | 34.78% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.20% | 7.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LQTI and AMDW have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.
AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 42.69%, compared with 9.20% for LQTI.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LQTI and 0.99% for AMDW.
Find the right allocation for LQTI and AMDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer