LQDH vs. APRD
LQDH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF) and APRD (Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - LQDH is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by iShares, while APRD is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator. Both are actively managed. LQDH charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for APRD.
Performance
LQDH vs. APRD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LQDH
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 3.11%
- 1Y
- 7.62%
- 3Y*
- 8.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.28%
- 10Y*
- 4.64%
APRD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQDH vs. APRD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 1.83% |
APRD Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQDH vs. APRD — Risk / Return Rank
LQDH
APRD
LQDH vs. APRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) and Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April (APRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LQDH | APRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.85 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LQDH | APRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | — | — |
Drawdowns
LQDH vs. APRD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQDH drawdown since its inception was -24.63%, which is greater than APRD's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDH and APRD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQDH | APRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.63% | 0.00% | -24.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | 0.00% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.68% | 0.00% | -1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.55% | — | — |
Volatility
LQDH vs. APRD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQDH | APRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70% | 0.00% | +2.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.41% | 0.00% | +4.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.44% | 0.00% | +6.44% |
LQDH vs. APRD - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQDH has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than APRD's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
LQDH vs. APRD - Dividend Comparison
LQDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%, while APRD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APRD Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 5.95% | 6.06% | 7.57% | 7.69% | 3.73% | 1.65% | 2.22% | 3.09% | 5.08% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, LQDH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQDH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for APRD.
LQDH has the higher dividend yield at 5.95%, compared with 0.00% for APRD.
LQDH is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while APRD is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LQDH and 0.79% for APRD.
Find the right allocation for LQDH and APRD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer