LQDH vs. ACWI
LQDH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LQDH is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by iShares, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. LQDH is actively managed, while ACWI is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LQDH returned 4.64%/yr vs 12.85%/yr for ACWI. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LQDH charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.
Performance
LQDH vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQDH achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 12.13% return. Over the past 10 years, LQDH has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 4.64%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.85% annualized return.
LQDH
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 3.11%
- 1Y
- 7.62%
- 3Y*
- 8.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.28%
- 10Y*
- 4.64%
ACWI
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 12.13%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- 29.18%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.85%
LQDH vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 2.31% | 7.00% | 7.43% | 11.14% | -1.88% | 1.84% | 1.68% | 9.50% | -2.20% | 6.00% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 12.13% | 22.41% | 17.45% | 22.27% | -18.39% | 18.66% | 16.34% | 26.59% | -9.19% | 24.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQDH and ACWI is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2014 | 0.46 |
The correlation between LQDH and ACWI shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQDH vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
LQDH
ACWI
LQDH vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LQDH | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.41 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 3.01 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.85 | 13.53 | +0.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LQDH | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.83 | 2.29 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.20 | 0.71 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.75 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.43 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
LQDH vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQDH drawdown since its inception was -24.63%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDH and ACWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQDH | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.63% | -56.00% | +31.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.34% | -9.73% | +7.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.86% | -16.55% | +11.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.08% | -26.42% | +19.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.63% | -33.53% | +8.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -0.83% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.68% | -8.61% | +6.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.55% | 2.16% | -1.61% |
Volatility
LQDH vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) is 0.50%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that LQDH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQDH | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.50% | 3.93% | -3.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.03% | 10.29% | -8.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70% | 12.78% | -10.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.41% | 16.05% | -11.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.44% | 17.11% | -10.67% |
LQDH vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQDH has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
LQDH vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
LQDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.38% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 5.95% | 6.06% | 7.57% | 7.69% | 3.73% | 1.65% | 2.22% | 3.09% | 5.08% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LQDH and ACWI have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACWI has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to LQDH (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQDH dropped -24.63% vs ACWI's -56.00%.
On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 12.85% vs 4.64% for LQDH. On fees, LQDH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, LQDH has been the lower-risk option at 0.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 12.85% return vs 4.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LQDH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.
LQDH has the higher dividend yield at 5.95%, compared with 1.38% for ACWI.
LQDH is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while ACWI is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LQDH and 0.32% for ACWI.
LQDH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LQDH and ACWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer