LQAI vs. BUFX
LQAI (LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF) and BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LQAI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by QRAFT, while BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LQAI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BUFX.
Performance
LQAI vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQAI achieves a 22.12% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 4.10% return.
LQAI
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 10.98%
- YTD
- 22.12%
- 6M
- 21.53%
- 1Y
- 42.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQAI vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LQAI LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF | 22.12% | 13.57% |
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 4.10% | 5.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQAI and BUFX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQAI vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank
LQAI
BUFX
LQAI vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LQAI | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.23 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.18 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LQAI | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.74 | 2.68 | -0.94 |
Drawdowns
LQAI vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQAI drawdown since its inception was -21.24%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQAI and BUFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQAI | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.24% | -2.87% | -18.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -0.07% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.06% | -0.24% | -2.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | — | — |
Volatility
LQAI vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQAI | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.93% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.43% | 3.98% | +11.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 3.98% | +13.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 3.98% | +13.00% |
LQAI vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQAI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
LQAI vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison
LQAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LQAI LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF | 0.89% | 1.14% | 0.69% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LQAI and BUFX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQAI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQAI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.
LQAI has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.
LQAI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: QRAFT and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for LQAI and 0.96% for BUFX.
Find the right allocation for LQAI and BUFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer