LPRE vs. RDOG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LPRE (Long Pond Real Estate Select ETF) and RDOG (ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF) are both REIT funds. LPRE is actively managed, while RDOG is passively managed. Over the past year, LPRE returned 19.82% vs 22.86% for RDOG. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LPRE charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RDOG.

Performance

LPRE vs. RDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Long Pond Real Estate Select ETF (LPRE) and ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LPRE achieves a 10.78% return, which is significantly lower than RDOG's 16.17% return.

LPRE

• 1D: 1.68%
• 1M: 4.92%
• YTD: 10.78%
• 6M: 14.50%
• 1Y: 19.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RDOG

• 1D: 2.12%
• 1M: 4.33%
• YTD: 16.17%
• 6M: 18.04%
• 1Y: 22.86%
• 3Y*: 12.57%
• 5Y*: 2.71%
• 10Y*: 4.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LPRE vs. RDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LPRE Long Pond Real Estate Select ETF	10.78%	17.18%
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF	16.17%	8.85%

Correlation

The correlation between LPRE and RDOG is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025	0.86

The correlation between LPRE and RDOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

LPRE vs. RDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LPRE	RDOG
Real Estate	75.0%	100.0%
Consumer Cyclical	25.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

LPRE vs. RDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LPRE

LPRE Risk / Return Rank: 39
LPRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
LPRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
LPRE Omega Ratio Rank: 35
LPRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
LPRE Martin Ratio Rank: 42

RDOG

RDOG Risk / Return Rank: 46
RDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
RDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
RDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 42
RDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
RDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LPRE vs. RDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Long Pond Real Estate Select ETF (LPRE) and ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LPRE	RDOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	1.57	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	2.28	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.27	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	2.29	-0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.61	7.42	-0.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LPRE vs. RDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LPRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the RDOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LPRE and RDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LPRE	RDOG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.29	1.57	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.39	0.17	+1.22

Drawdowns

LPRE vs. RDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LPRE drawdown since its inception was -10.33%, smaller than the maximum RDOG drawdown of -67.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPRE and RDOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	LPRE	RDOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.33%	-67.59%	+57.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.33%	-10.02%	-0.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.40%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.52%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-49.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	0.00%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.13%	-12.26%	+10.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	3.09%	-0.09%

Volatility

LPRE vs. RDOG - Volatility Comparison

Long Pond Real Estate Select ETF (LPRE) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) at 4.16%. This indicates that LPRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LPRE	RDOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.69%	4.16%	+0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.00%	10.60%	+0.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.47%	14.66%	+0.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.17%	19.87%	-1.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.17%	23.05%	-4.88%

LPRE vs. RDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LPRE has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than RDOG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

LPRE vs. RDOG - Dividend Comparison

LPRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than RDOG's 6.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LPRE Long Pond Real Estate Select ETF	1.14%	0.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF	6.00%	6.91%	6.11%	7.07%	5.25%	3.11%	5.12%	3.10%	3.13%	3.64%	3.66%	3.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LPRE and RDOG in my portfolio?

LPRE and RDOG have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LPRE or RDOG?

LPRE has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to RDOG (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPRE dropped -10.33% vs RDOG's -67.59%.

Which ETF is better, LPRE or RDOG?

On 1-year performance, RDOG leads with 22.86% vs 19.82% for LPRE. On fees, RDOG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LPRE or RDOG?

Over the 1-year period, RDOG has performed better with a 22.86% return vs 19.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LPRE or RDOG?

RDOG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for LPRE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LPRE or RDOG?

RDOG has the higher dividend yield at 6.00%, compared with 1.14% for LPRE.

What is the main difference between LPRE and RDOG?

They also come from different issuers: Long Pond and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for LPRE and 0.35% for RDOG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.