PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LPRE vs. DTCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LPRE vs. DTCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Long Pond Real Estate Select ETF (LPRE) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LPRE achieves a 8.96% return, which is significantly lower than DTCR's 52.56% return.


LPRE

1D
-0.22%
1M
3.89%
YTD
8.96%
6M
11.03%
1Y
18.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DTCR

1D
-0.74%
1M
11.31%
YTD
52.56%
6M
54.49%
1Y
84.73%
3Y*
36.32%
5Y*
15.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LPRE vs. DTCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LPRE and DTCR is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025

0.37

LPRE vs. DTCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LPRE
DTCR

Real Estate

75.0%
56.8%

Consumer Cyclical

25.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

2.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

40.8%

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

LPRE
75.0%
DTCR
56.8%

Consumer Cyclical

LPRE
25.0%
DTCR

-

Basic Materials

LPRE

-

DTCR

-

Communication Services

LPRE

-

DTCR
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

LPRE

-

DTCR

-

Energy

LPRE

-

DTCR

-

Financial Services

LPRE

-

DTCR

-

Healthcare

LPRE

-

DTCR

-

Industrials

LPRE

-

DTCR

-

Technology

LPRE

-

DTCR
40.8%

Utilities

LPRE

-

DTCR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LPRE vs. DTCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LPRE
LPRE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
LPRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LPRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
LPRE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
LPRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
LPRE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

DTCR
DTCR Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DTCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTCR Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DTCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTCR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LPRE vs. DTCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Long Pond Real Estate Select ETF (LPRE) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LPREDTCRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.21

3.90

-2.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.83

4.71

-2.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.61

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

6.61

-4.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.21

20.78

-14.57

LPRE vs. DTCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LPRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the DTCR Sharpe Ratio of 3.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LPRE and DTCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LPREDTCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

3.90

-2.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

0.76

+0.54

Drawdowns

LPRE vs. DTCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LPRE drawdown since its inception was -10.33%, smaller than the maximum DTCR drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPRE and DTCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LPREDTCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.33%

-38.98%

+28.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.33%

-12.89%

+2.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-0.74%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.14%

-12.37%

+10.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

4.09%

-1.09%

Volatility

LPRE vs. DTCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Long Pond Real Estate Select ETF (LPRE) is 4.47%, while Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that LPRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LPREDTCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

7.16%

-2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.88%

16.92%

-6.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.39%

21.84%

-6.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.14%

21.83%

-3.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.14%

21.90%

-3.76%

LPRE vs. DTCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

LPRE has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than DTCR's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

LPRE vs. DTCR - Dividend Comparison

LPRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than DTCR's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
0.72%1.10%1.72%1.18%2.57%1.27%0.30%
LPRE
Long Pond Real Estate Select ETF
1.16%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LPRE and DTCR have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTCR has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to LPRE (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPRE dropped -10.33% vs DTCR's -38.98%.

On 1-year performance, DTCR leads with 84.73% vs 18.62% for LPRE. On fees, DTCR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, LPRE has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DTCR has performed better with a 84.73% return vs 18.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DTCR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for LPRE.

LPRE has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.72% for DTCR.

They also come from different issuers: Long Pond and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for LPRE and 0.50% for DTCR.

DTCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.90 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LPRE and DTCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer