LPRE vs. IFGL
LPRE (Long Pond Real Estate Select ETF) and IFGL (iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. LPRE is actively managed, while IFGL is passively managed. Over the past year, LPRE returned 20.16% vs 2.52% for IFGL. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LPRE charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for IFGL.
Performance
LPRE vs. IFGL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LPRE achieves a 13.49% return, which is significantly higher than IFGL's -2.59% return.
LPRE
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- 13.49%
- 6M
- 13.92%
- 1Y
- 20.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFGL
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- -2.59%
- 6M
- -2.53%
- 1Y
- 2.52%
- 3Y*
- 8.32%
- 5Y*
- -2.69%
- 10Y*
- 1.88%
LPRE vs. IFGL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LPRE Long Pond Real Estate Select ETF | 13.49% | 16.34% |
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF | -2.59% | 19.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between LPRE and IFGL is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025 | 0.57 |
The correlation between LPRE and IFGL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LPRE vs. IFGL — Risk / Return Rank
LPRE
IFGL
LPRE vs. IFGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Long Pond Real Estate Select ETF (LPRE) and iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LPRE | IFGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.04 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 0.18 | +1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.73 | 0.47 | +6.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LPRE vs. IFGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LPRE drawdown since its inception was -10.33%, smaller than the maximum IFGL drawdown of -68.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPRE and IFGL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LPRE | IFGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.33% | -68.93% | +58.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.33% | -14.38% | +4.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -15.30% | +14.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.09% | -17.31% | +15.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 5.38% | -2.37% |
Volatility
LPRE vs. IFGL - Volatility Comparison
Long Pond Real Estate Select ETF (LPRE) and iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) have volatilities of 4.16% and 4.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LPRE | IFGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 4.37% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.07% | 11.94% | -0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.52% | 13.95% | +1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 16.39% | +1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 16.45% | +1.59% |
LPRE vs. IFGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
LPRE has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than IFGL's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
LPRE vs. IFGL - Dividend Comparison
LPRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than IFGL's 4.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF | 4.22% | 3.71% | 4.83% | 1.82% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 2.17% | 7.60% | 4.10% | 4.90% | 7.68% | 3.70% |
LPRE Long Pond Real Estate Select ETF | 1.12% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LPRE and IFGL have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IFGL has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to LPRE (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPRE dropped -10.33% vs IFGL's -68.93%.
On 1-year performance, LPRE leads with 20.16% vs 2.52% for IFGL. On fees, IFGL is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, LPRE has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LPRE has performed better with a 20.16% return vs 2.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFGL is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for LPRE.
IFGL has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 1.12% for LPRE.
They also come from different issuers: Long Pond and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for LPRE and 0.48% for IFGL.
LPRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LPRE and IFGL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer