LPRE vs. BLDG
LPRE (Long Pond Real Estate Select ETF) and BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LPRE returned 19.82% vs 11.06% for BLDG. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LPRE charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BLDG.
Performance
LPRE vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LPRE achieves a 10.78% return, which is significantly higher than BLDG's 6.82% return.
LPRE
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 10.78%
- 6M
- 14.50%
- 1Y
- 19.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLDG
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- 6.82%
- 6M
- 6.29%
- 1Y
- 11.06%
- 3Y*
- 9.14%
- 5Y*
- 2.40%
- 10Y*
- —
LPRE vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LPRE Long Pond Real Estate Select ETF | 10.78% | 17.18% |
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 6.82% | 13.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between LPRE and BLDG is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025 | 0.75 |
The correlation between LPRE and BLDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
LPRE vs. BLDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LPRE
BLDG
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
LPRE
BLDG
Consumer Cyclical
LPRE
BLDG
-
Basic Materials
LPRE
-
BLDG
-
Communication Services
LPRE
-
BLDG
-
Consumer Defensive
LPRE
-
BLDG
-
Energy
LPRE
-
BLDG
-
Financial Services
LPRE
-
BLDG
Healthcare
LPRE
-
BLDG
-
Industrials
LPRE
-
BLDG
-
Technology
LPRE
-
BLDG
-
Utilities
LPRE
-
BLDG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LPRE vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank
LPRE
BLDG
LPRE vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Long Pond Real Estate Select ETF (LPRE) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LPRE | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.17 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 1.10 | +0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.61 | 3.88 | +2.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LPRE | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 1.00 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.39 | 0.46 | +0.93 |
Drawdowns
LPRE vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LPRE drawdown since its inception was -10.33%, smaller than the maximum BLDG drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPRE and BLDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LPRE | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.33% | -27.25% | +16.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.33% | -10.08% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -1.96% | +1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.13% | -9.22% | +7.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 2.86% | +0.14% |
Volatility
LPRE vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison
Long Pond Real Estate Select ETF (LPRE) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) at 3.58%. This indicates that LPRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LPRE | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.69% | 3.58% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.00% | 8.26% | +2.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.47% | 11.09% | +4.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.17% | 15.27% | +2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.17% | 15.54% | +2.63% |
LPRE vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LPRE has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
LPRE vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison
LPRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than BLDG's 5.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 5.68% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 4.99% | 3.99% | 10.40% | 0.59% |
LPRE Long Pond Real Estate Select ETF | 1.14% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LPRE and BLDG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LPRE has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to BLDG (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPRE dropped -10.33% vs BLDG's -27.25%.
On 1-year performance, LPRE leads with 19.82% vs 11.06% for BLDG. On fees, BLDG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, BLDG has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LPRE has performed better with a 19.82% return vs 11.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BLDG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for LPRE.
BLDG has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 1.14% for LPRE.
They also come from different issuers: Long Pond and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for LPRE and 0.59% for BLDG.
LPRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LPRE and BLDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer