LPEFX vs. MDGCX
LPEFX (ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund) and MDGCX (BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LPEFX returned 9.69%/yr vs 12.09%/yr for MDGCX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LPEFX charges 1.46%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for MDGCX.
Performance
LPEFX vs. MDGCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LPEFX achieves a -5.62% return, which is significantly lower than MDGCX's 17.31% return. Over the past 10 years, LPEFX has underperformed MDGCX with an annualized return of 9.69%, while MDGCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.09% annualized return.
LPEFX
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- 6M
- -8.83%
- YTD
- -5.62%
- 1Y
- -8.52%
- 3Y*
- 7.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.46%
- 10Y*
- 9.69%
MDGCX
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 13.81%
- YTD
- 17.31%
- 1Y
- 32.61%
- 3Y*
- 19.29%
- 5Y*
- 11.21%
- 10Y*
- 12.09%
LPEFX vs. MDGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPEFX ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund | -5.62% | 1.25% | 17.78% | 28.31% | -28.82% | 23.70% | 9.35% | 49.57% | -12.60% | 27.02% |
MDGCX BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. | 17.31% | 23.61% | 10.87% | 22.43% | -17.94% | 17.52% | 15.61% | 25.54% | -11.73% | 23.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between LPEFX and MDGCX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2007 | 0.79 |
The correlation between LPEFX and MDGCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LPEFX vs. MDGCX — Risk / Return Rank
LPEFX
MDGCX
LPEFX vs. MDGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund (LPEFX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LPEFX | MDGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.44 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 4.10 | -4.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | 16.26 | -16.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LPEFX vs. MDGCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LPEFX drawdown since its inception was -77.00%, which is greater than MDGCX's maximum drawdown of -48.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPEFX and MDGCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LPEFX | MDGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.00% | -48.25% | -28.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.00% | -8.07% | -13.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.00% | -21.46% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.19% | -26.68% | -22.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.19% | -34.87% | -14.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.52% | -2.08% | -15.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.74% | -9.90% | -12.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.17% | 2.03% | +8.14% |
Volatility
LPEFX vs. MDGCX - Volatility Comparison
ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund (LPEFX) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX) at 4.09%. This indicates that LPEFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LPEFX | MDGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.22% | 4.09% | +1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.22% | 11.34% | +3.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.38% | 13.62% | +4.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.66% | 16.31% | +8.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.68% | 17.11% | +5.57% |
LPEFX vs. MDGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LPEFX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than MDGCX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
LPEFX vs. MDGCX - Dividend Comparison
LPEFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.29%, more than MDGCX's 7.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPEFX ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund | 16.29% | 15.38% | 15.95% | 5.56% | 0.00% | 26.79% | 3.96% | 21.96% | 4.58% | 13.29% | 1.55% | 8.21% |
MDGCX BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. | 7.60% | 8.91% | 7.78% | 1.42% | 1.75% | 16.75% | 3.77% | 1.73% | 4.06% | 34.82% | 0.65% | 5.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LPEFX and MDGCX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LPEFX has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to MDGCX (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPEFX dropped -77.00% vs MDGCX's -48.25%.
MDGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LPEFX and MDGCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer