LPEFX vs. GQFPX
LPEFX (ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund) and GQFPX (GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, LPEFX returned 1.72%/yr vs 10.25%/yr for GQFPX. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LPEFX charges 1.46%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for GQFPX.
Performance
LPEFX vs. GQFPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LPEFX achieves a -7.91% return, which is significantly lower than GQFPX's 9.04% return.
LPEFX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- 6M
- -9.81%
- YTD
- -7.91%
- 1Y
- -10.48%
- 3Y*
- 7.00%
- 5Y*
- 1.72%
- 10Y*
- 9.42%
GQFPX
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- 6M
- 8.95%
- YTD
- 9.04%
- 1Y
- 14.93%
- 3Y*
- 13.45%
- 5Y*
- 10.25%
- 10Y*
- —
LPEFX vs. GQFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPEFX ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund | -7.91% | 1.25% | 17.78% | 28.31% | -28.82% | 8.33% |
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund | 9.04% | 19.29% | 4.81% | 15.09% | -1.13% | 5.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between LPEFX and GQFPX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LPEFX and GQFPX has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LPEFX vs. GQFPX — Risk / Return Rank
LPEFX
GQFPX
LPEFX vs. GQFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund (LPEFX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LPEFX | GQFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.26 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 2.41 | -2.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 6.39 | -7.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LPEFX vs. GQFPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LPEFX drawdown since its inception was -77.00%, which is greater than GQFPX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPEFX and GQFPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LPEFX | GQFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.00% | -16.95% | -60.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.00% | -6.28% | -15.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.00% | -10.57% | -11.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.19% | -16.95% | -32.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.52% | -3.72% | -15.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.74% | -3.04% | -19.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.13% | 2.36% | +7.77% |
Volatility
LPEFX vs. GQFPX - Volatility Comparison
ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund (LPEFX) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) at 4.33%. This indicates that LPEFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LPEFX | GQFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 4.33% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.11% | 8.40% | +6.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.30% | 10.17% | +8.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.65% | 12.85% | +11.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.67% | 12.84% | +9.83% |
LPEFX vs. GQFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LPEFX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than GQFPX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
LPEFX vs. GQFPX - Dividend Comparison
LPEFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.70%, more than GQFPX's 5.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund | 5.65% | 5.32% | 3.71% | 3.69% | 5.18% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LPEFX ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund | 16.70% | 15.38% | 15.95% | 5.56% | 0.00% | 26.79% | 3.96% | 21.96% | 4.58% | 13.29% | 1.55% | 8.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LPEFX and GQFPX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LPEFX has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to GQFPX (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPEFX dropped -77.00% vs GQFPX's -16.95%.
GQFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LPEFX and GQFPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer