LOWV vs. VSMV
LOWV (AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF) and VSMV (VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LOWV is a Low Volatility fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while VSMV is a Multi-factor fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index. LOWV is actively managed, while VSMV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LOWV returned 14.74%/yr vs 14.87%/yr for VSMV. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LOWV charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for VSMV.
Performance
LOWV vs. VSMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOWV achieves a 5.85% return, which is significantly lower than VSMV's 8.83% return.
LOWV
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- 6M
- 5.32%
- YTD
- 5.85%
- 1Y
- 11.55%
- 3Y*
- 14.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.14%
VSMV
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- YTD
- 8.83%
- 1Y
- 23.97%
- 3Y*
- 14.87%
- 5Y*
- 10.59%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $248.27K | $453.80K | $603.81K | |
| $373.65K | $273.95K | $267.92K |
LOWV vs. VSMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LOWV AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF | 5.85% | 12.26% | 20.43% | 18.90% |
VSMV VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF | 8.83% | 16.77% | 15.79% | 13.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOWV and VSMV is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2023 | 0.77 |
The correlation between LOWV and VSMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LOWV vs. VSMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LOWV
VSMV
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Technology
LOWV
VSMV
Financial Services
LOWV
VSMV
Healthcare
LOWV
VSMV
Communication Services
LOWV
VSMV
Consumer Cyclical
LOWV
VSMV
Industrials
LOWV
VSMV
Consumer Defensive
LOWV
VSMV
Utilities
LOWV
VSMV
Energy
LOWV
VSMV
Real Estate
LOWV
VSMV
Basic Materials
LOWV
-
VSMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOWV vs. VSMV — Risk / Return Rank
LOWV
VSMV
LOWV vs. VSMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) and VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LOWV | VSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.44 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 4.47 | -3.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.25 | 16.05 | -11.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LOWV vs. VSMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOWV drawdown since its inception was -13.87%, smaller than the maximum VSMV drawdown of -31.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOWV and VSMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOWV | VSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.87% | -31.33% | +17.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.59% | -5.18% | -4.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.87% | -13.22% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.82% | +2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.49% | -3.38% | +1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 1.44% | +0.97% |
Volatility
LOWV vs. VSMV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) is 2.56%, while VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) has a volatility of 3.13%. This indicates that LOWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VSMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOWV | VSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.56% | 3.13% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.89% | 6.92% | +0.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.58% | 9.50% | +1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.87% | 12.89% | -1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.87% | 14.98% | -3.11% |
LOWV vs. VSMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOWV has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than VSMV's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOWV vs. VSMV - Dividend Comparison
LOWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than VSMV's 1.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOWV AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF | 0.86% | 0.85% | 0.92% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VSMV VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.32% | 1.35% | 1.36% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 1.36% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.42% | 1.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOWV and VSMV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VSMV has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to LOWV (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOWV dropped -13.87% vs VSMV's -31.33%.
On 3-year performance, VSMV leads with 14.87% vs 14.74% for LOWV. On fees, VSMV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, LOWV has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VSMV has performed better with a 14.87% return vs 14.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VSMV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for LOWV.
VSMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.86% for LOWV.
LOWV is categorized as Low Volatility, while VSMV is Multi-factor. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for LOWV and 0.35% for VSMV.
VSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LOWV and VSMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer