LOWV vs. PGR
LOWV (AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while PGR (The Progressive Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, LOWV returned 14.02%/yr vs 23.12%/yr for PGR. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LOWV vs. PGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOWV achieves a 3.79% return, which is significantly higher than PGR's -0.79% return.
LOWV
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- 6M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 3.79%
- 1Y
- 8.40%
- 3Y*
- 14.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.62%
PGR
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- 6M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- -0.79%
- 1Y
- -8.28%
- 3Y*
- 23.12%
- 5Y*
- 20.34%
- 10Y*
- 23.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.86%
LOWV vs. PGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LOWV AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF | 3.79% | 12.26% | 20.43% | 18.90% |
PGR The Progressive Corporation | -0.79% | -3.02% | 51.39% | 13.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOWV and PGR is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2023 | 0.16 |
The correlation between LOWV and PGR shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOWV vs. PGR — Risk / Return Rank
LOWV
PGR
LOWV vs. PGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) and The Progressive Corporation (PGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LOWV | PGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.96 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | -0.42 | +1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.50 | -0.71 | +4.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LOWV vs. PGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOWV drawdown since its inception was -13.87%, smaller than the maximum PGR drawdown of -71.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOWV and PGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOWV | PGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.87% | -71.06% | +57.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.59% | -19.79% | +10.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.87% | -30.35% | +16.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -22.33% | +21.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -14.55% | +13.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 11.71% | -9.30% |
Volatility
LOWV vs. PGR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) is 2.24%, while The Progressive Corporation (PGR) has a volatility of 14.04%. This indicates that LOWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOWV | PGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.24% | 14.04% | -11.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.97% | 20.19% | -12.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.39% | 25.34% | -14.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.88% | 25.16% | -13.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.88% | 24.79% | -12.91% |
Dividends
LOWV vs. PGR - Dividend Comparison
LOWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than PGR's 6.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOWV AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF | 0.87% | 0.85% | 0.92% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PGR The Progressive Corporation | 6.55% | 2.15% | 0.48% | 0.25% | 0.31% | 6.23% | 2.68% | 3.89% | 1.86% | 1.21% | 2.50% | 2.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOWV and PGR have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PGR has higher volatility (14.04%) compared to LOWV (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOWV dropped -13.87% vs PGR's -71.06%.
LOWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LOWV and PGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer