PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LNOIX vs. LNCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LNOIX vs. LNCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund (LNOIX) and Ladenburg Income Fund (LNCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNOIX achieves a 4.80% return, which is significantly higher than LNCIX's 2.59% return. Over the past 10 years, LNOIX has outperformed LNCIX with an annualized return of 4.61%, while LNCIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.19% annualized return.


LNOIX

1D
0.74%
1M
-0.60%
6M
3.28%
YTD
4.80%
1Y
10.61%
3Y*
6.08%
5Y*
2.58%
10Y*
4.61%
ALL TIME*
4.87%

LNCIX

1D
0.40%
1M
-0.68%
6M
1.57%
YTD
2.59%
1Y
7.21%
3Y*
6.18%
5Y*
2.10%
10Y*
3.19%
ALL TIME*
3.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LNOIX vs. LNCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LNOIX
Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund
4.80%9.40%1.50%11.87%-14.51%8.43%8.21%15.32%-5.05%9.48%
LNCIX
Ladenburg Income Fund
2.59%8.91%4.47%8.46%-12.62%3.11%5.76%11.70%-3.64%6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between LNOIX and LNCIX is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.92

The correlation between LNOIX and LNCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LNOIX vs. LNCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LNOIX
LNOIX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
LNOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LNOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
LNOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
LNOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
LNOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

LNCIX
LNCIX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
LNCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LNCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
LNCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
LNCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
LNCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LNOIX vs. LNCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund (LNOIX) and Ladenburg Income Fund (LNCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LNOIXLNCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.26

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

1.81

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.26

7.44

+0.82

LNOIX vs. LNCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LNOIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the LNCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNOIX and LNCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LNOIX vs. LNCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNOIX drawdown since its inception was -19.03%, which is greater than LNCIX's maximum drawdown of -16.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNOIX and LNCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LNOIXLNCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.03%

-16.72%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.04%

-4.01%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.50%

-8.69%

-7.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.03%

-16.72%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.03%

-16.72%

-2.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-1.03%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-3.44%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

0.97%

+0.24%

Volatility

LNOIX vs. LNCIX - Volatility Comparison

Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund (LNOIX) has a higher volatility of 1.79% compared to Ladenburg Income Fund (LNCIX) at 1.35%. This indicates that LNOIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LNOIXLNCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.79%

1.35%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.51%

4.26%

+1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.89%

5.18%

+1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.55%

6.89%

+2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.95%

6.20%

+2.75%

LNOIX vs. LNCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LNOIX and LNCIX have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Dividends

LNOIX vs. LNCIX - Dividend Comparison

LNOIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than LNCIX's 3.47% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LNCIX
Ladenburg Income Fund
3.47%3.45%2.17%2.29%2.02%6.02%1.22%2.25%1.80%1.49%
LNOIX
Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund
3.61%3.65%1.65%1.80%2.60%1.76%1.06%1.91%1.67%1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, LNOIX and LNCIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LNOIX has higher volatility (1.79%) compared to LNCIX (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNOIX dropped -19.03% vs LNCIX's -16.72%.

LNOIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LNOIX and LNCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer