PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LNOIX vs. FSRKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LNOIX vs. FSRKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund (LNOIX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNOIX achieves a 4.80% return, which is significantly lower than FSRKX's 6.99% return.


LNOIX

1D
0.74%
1M
-0.60%
6M
3.28%
YTD
4.80%
1Y
10.61%
3Y*
6.08%
5Y*
2.58%
10Y*
4.61%
ALL TIME*
4.87%

FSRKX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.64%
6M
3.39%
YTD
6.99%
1Y
13.35%
3Y*
8.30%
5Y*
5.72%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LNOIX vs. FSRKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LNOIX
Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund
4.80%9.40%1.50%11.87%-14.51%8.43%8.21%4.14%
FSRKX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6
6.99%10.59%6.00%4.81%-3.13%16.06%3.94%1.66%

Correlation

The correlation between LNOIX and FSRKX is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2019

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between LNOIX and FSRKX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LNOIX vs. FSRKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LNOIX
LNOIX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
LNOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LNOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
LNOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
LNOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
LNOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FSRKX
FSRKX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FSRKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRKX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LNOIX vs. FSRKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund (LNOIX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LNOIXFSRKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.50

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

3.55

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.26

11.71

-3.45

LNOIX vs. FSRKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LNOIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the FSRKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNOIX and FSRKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LNOIX vs. FSRKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNOIX drawdown since its inception was -19.03%, roughly equal to the maximum FSRKX drawdown of -19.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNOIX and FSRKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LNOIXFSRKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.03%

-19.93%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.04%

-3.60%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.50%

-5.84%

-10.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.03%

-12.74%

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-2.37%

+1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-3.19%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

1.11%

+0.10%

Volatility

LNOIX vs. FSRKX - Volatility Comparison

Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund (LNOIX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX) have volatilities of 1.79% and 1.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LNOIXFSRKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.79%

1.83%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.51%

3.90%

+1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.89%

5.06%

+1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.55%

6.94%

+2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.95%

7.75%

+1.20%

LNOIX vs. FSRKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LNOIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FSRKX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

LNOIX vs. FSRKX - Dividend Comparison

LNOIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than FSRKX's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSRKX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6
3.29%4.83%4.98%5.38%7.38%5.43%2.31%1.16%0.00%0.00%
LNOIX
Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund
3.61%3.65%1.65%1.80%2.60%1.76%1.06%1.91%1.67%1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


LNOIX and FSRKX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSRKX has higher volatility (1.83%) compared to LNOIX (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNOIX dropped -19.03% vs FSRKX's -19.93%.

FSRKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LNOIX and FSRKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer