LOW vs. MS
LOW (Lowe's Companies, Inc.) and MS (Morgan Stanley) are both stocks. LOW operates in Home Improvement Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while MS operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, LOW returned 13.33%/yr vs 27.71%/yr for MS. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LOW vs. MS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOW achieves a -7.60% return, which is significantly lower than MS's 21.88% return. Over the past 10 years, LOW has underperformed MS with an annualized return of 13.33%, while MS has yielded a comparatively higher 27.71% annualized return.
LOW
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- -7.60%
- 6M
- -9.89%
- 1Y
- 3.61%
- 3Y*
- 2.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.93%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
MS
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 11.18%
- YTD
- 21.88%
- 6M
- 21.28%
- 1Y
- 69.28%
- 3Y*
- 38.69%
- 5Y*
- 22.26%
- 10Y*
- 27.71%
LOW vs. MS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOW Lowe's Companies, Inc. | -7.60% | -0.33% | 13.01% | 14.03% | -21.49% | 63.34% | 36.40% | 32.23% | 1.22% | 33.29% |
MS Morgan Stanley | 21.88% | 45.16% | 39.73% | 13.93% | -10.34% | 46.65% | 38.09% | 32.67% | -22.76% | 26.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOW and MS is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 1993 | 0.39 |
The correlation between LOW and MS shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.40 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LOW:
$123.64B
MS:
$340.97B
LOW:
$11.86
MS:
$11.41
LOW:
18.62
MS:
18.75
LOW:
20.34
MS:
1.76
LOW:
1.40
MS:
2.84
LOW:
$88.43B
MS:
$120.22B
LOW:
$29.89B
MS:
$69.72B
LOW:
$11.50B
MS:
$27.21B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOW vs. MS — Risk / Return Rank
LOW
MS
LOW vs. MS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) and Morgan Stanley (MS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LOW | MS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.43 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 3.53 | -3.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.06 | 11.65 | -11.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LOW vs. MS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOW drawdown since its inception was -62.52%, smaller than the maximum MS drawdown of -88.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOW and MS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOW | MS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.52% | -88.12% | +25.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.75% | -18.83% | -8.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.75% | -29.24% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.86% | -32.38% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.63% | -51.33% | +2.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.81% | -1.94% | -20.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.60% | -33.69% | +17.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.31% | 5.70% | +6.61% |
Volatility
LOW vs. MS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) is 8.08%, while Morgan Stanley (MS) has a volatility of 8.62%. This indicates that LOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOW | MS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.08% | 8.62% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.39% | 21.46% | -1.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.16% | 25.81% | +0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.23% | 28.75% | -2.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.17% | 31.51% | -2.34% |
Dividends
LOW vs. MS - Dividend Comparison
LOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than MS's 1.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOW Lowe's Companies, Inc. | 2.17% | 1.95% | 1.82% | 1.93% | 1.86% | 1.08% | 1.40% | 1.72% | 1.93% | 1.64% | 1.77% | 1.34% |
MS Morgan Stanley | 1.87% | 2.17% | 2.82% | 3.49% | 3.47% | 2.14% | 2.04% | 2.54% | 2.77% | 1.72% | 1.66% | 1.73% |
Financials
LOW vs. MS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lowe's Companies, Inc. and Morgan Stanley. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LOW vs. MS - Profitability Comparison
LOW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lowe's Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.54B and revenue of 23.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.
MS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported a gross profit of 20.48B and revenue of 33.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.8%.
LOW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lowe's Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.55B and revenue of 23.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.
MS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported an operating income of 7.01B and revenue of 33.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.2%.
LOW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lowe's Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 1.63B and revenue of 23.08B, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.
MS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported a net income of 5.64B and revenue of 33.15B, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LOW and MS have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MS has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to LOW (8.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOW dropped -62.52% vs MS's -88.12%.
MS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LOW and MS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer