LOOMIS.ST vs. MAP.MC
LOOMIS.ST (Loomis AB ser. B) and MAP.MC (Mapfre) are both stocks. LOOMIS.ST operates in Security & Protection Services (Industrials), while MAP.MC operates in Insurance - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, LOOMIS.ST returned 12.09%/yr vs 16.28%/yr for MAP.MC. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LOOMIS.ST vs. MAP.MC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LOOMIS.ST is traded in SEK, while MAP.MC is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the MAP.MC values have been converted to SEK using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOOMIS.ST achieves a 24.90% return, which is significantly higher than MAP.MC's -1.10% return. Over the past 10 years, LOOMIS.ST has underperformed MAP.MC with an annualized return of 12.09%, while MAP.MC has yielded a comparatively higher 16.28% annualized return.
LOOMIS.ST
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 2.69%
- YTD
- 24.90%
- 6M
- 31.64%
- 1Y
- 30.10%
- 3Y*
- 19.95%
- 5Y*
- 15.62%
- 10Y*
- 12.09%
MAP.MC
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- -1.10%
- 6M
- 2.88%
- 1Y
- 28.91%
- 3Y*
- 34.42%
- 5Y*
- 26.21%
- 10Y*
- 16.28%
LOOMIS.ST vs. MAP.MC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOOMIS.ST Loomis AB ser. B | 24.90% | 20.26% | 32.10% | -2.72% | 23.04% | 8.81% | -40.30% | 39.64% | -14.65% | 30.19% |
MAP.MC Mapfre | -1.10% | 72.88% | 37.05% | 13.74% | 16.48% | 24.69% | -30.33% | 11.46% | -5.14% | -0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOOMIS.ST and MAP.MC is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2008 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOOMIS.ST vs. MAP.MC — Risk / Return Rank
LOOMIS.ST
MAP.MC
LOOMIS.ST vs. MAP.MC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis AB ser. B (LOOMIS.ST) and Mapfre (MAP.MC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LOOMIS.ST | MAP.MC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.24 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 1.58 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.61 | 4.17 | -0.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LOOMIS.ST vs. MAP.MC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOOMIS.ST drawdown since its inception was -61.81%, roughly equal to the maximum MAP.MC drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOOMIS.ST and MAP.MC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOOMIS.ST | MAP.MC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.81% | -59.35% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.95% | -17.89% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.09% | -17.89% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.14% | -21.73% | -6.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.81% | -50.18% | -11.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.06% | -2.19% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.70% | -16.64% | +2.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.84% | 6.79% | +1.05% |
Volatility
LOOMIS.ST vs. MAP.MC - Volatility Comparison
Loomis AB ser. B (LOOMIS.ST) has a higher volatility of 6.46% compared to Mapfre (MAP.MC) at 5.09%. This indicates that LOOMIS.ST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAP.MC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOOMIS.ST | MAP.MC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.46% | 5.09% | +1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.36% | 17.06% | +3.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.58% | 21.75% | +3.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.39% | 21.47% | +6.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.84% | 24.87% | +6.97% |
Dividends
LOOMIS.ST vs. MAP.MC - Dividend Comparison
LOOMIS.ST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than MAP.MC's 3.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOOMIS.ST Loomis AB ser. B | 4.29% | 3.59% | 3.72% | 4.48% | 2.97% | 2.49% | 2.43% | 2.58% | 3.15% | 2.32% | 2.58% | 2.27% |
MAP.MC Mapfre | 3.88% | 3.90% | 5.15% | 6.09% | 6.82% | 7.53% | 8.57% | 6.20% | 6.30% | 5.46% | 4.23% | 6.06% |
Financials
LOOMIS.ST vs. MAP.MC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Loomis AB ser. B and Mapfre. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LOOMIS.ST and MAP.MC have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LOOMIS.ST and MAP.MC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer