LONGX vs. WALSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LONGX (Longboard Alternative Growth Fund) and WALSX (Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 3 years, LONGX returned 11.18%/yr vs 6.19%/yr for WALSX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LONGX charges 1.99%/yr vs 1.75%/yr for WALSX.

Performance

LONGX vs. WALSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX) and Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund (WALSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LONGX achieves a 9.61% return, which is significantly higher than WALSX's 5.30% return.

LONGX

• 1D: 0.98%
• 1M: 1.67%
• YTD: 9.61%
• 6M: 9.10%
• 1Y: 13.95%
• 3Y*: 11.18%
• 5Y*: 4.47%
• 10Y*: 24.86%

WALSX

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 5.30%
• 6M: 2.38%
• 1Y: -4.23%
• 3Y*: 6.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LONGX vs. WALSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LONGX Longboard Alternative Growth Fund	9.61%	1.49%	14.95%	5.64%	-13.21%	5.22%
WALSX Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund	5.30%	-12.79%	7.24%	27.75%	-8.38%	12.20%

Correlation

The correlation between LONGX and WALSX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2021	0.76

The correlation between LONGX and WALSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LONGX vs. WALSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LONGX

LONGX Risk / Return Rank: 26
LONGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
LONGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
LONGX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
LONGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
LONGX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

WALSX

WALSX Risk / Return Rank: 2
WALSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
WALSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
WALSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
WALSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
WALSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LONGX vs. WALSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX) and Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund (WALSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LONGX	WALSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	-0.18	+1.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	-0.16	+2.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	0.98	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	-0.21	+2.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.73	-0.40	+8.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LONGX vs. WALSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LONGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the WALSX Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LONGX and WALSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LONGX	WALSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.34	-0.18	+1.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.35	-0.18

Drawdowns

LONGX vs. WALSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LONGX drawdown since its inception was -77.16%, which is greater than WALSX's maximum drawdown of -25.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LONGX and WALSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LONGX	WALSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.16%	-25.28%	-51.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.09%	-13.42%	+6.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.57%	-25.28%	+10.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.48%	-19.15%	+18.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.37%	-9.52%	+2.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.84%	7.12%	-5.28%

Volatility

LONGX vs. WALSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX) is 3.15%, while Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund (WALSX) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that LONGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WALSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LONGX	WALSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.15%	4.15%	-1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.29%	11.81%	-3.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.61%	15.83%	-5.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.88%	16.37%	-4.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	137.76%	16.37%	+121.39%

LONGX vs. WALSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LONGX has a 1.99% expense ratio, which is higher than WALSX's 1.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

LONGX vs. WALSX - Dividend Comparison

Neither LONGX nor WALSX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
LONGX Longboard Alternative Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.40%	7.64%	1.73%	0.00%	0.00%	3.10%	268.50%	23.29%
WALSX Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LONGX and WALSX in my portfolio?

LONGX and WALSX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LONGX or WALSX?

WALSX has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to LONGX (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LONGX dropped -77.16% vs WALSX's -25.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LONGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.