WALSX vs. QLENX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

WALSX (Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund) and QLENX (AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 3 years, WALSX returned 5.68%/yr vs 25.60%/yr for QLENX. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WALSX charges 1.75%/yr vs 1.57%/yr for QLENX.

Performance

WALSX vs. QLENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund (WALSX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N (QLENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WALSX achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly higher than QLENX's -0.83% return.

WALSX

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 1.17%
• YTD: 5.70%
• 6M: 3.93%
• 1Y: -3.21%
• 3Y*: 5.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QLENX

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.94%
• YTD: -0.83%
• 6M: -1.31%
• 1Y: 15.29%
• 3Y*: 25.60%
• 5Y*: 23.23%
• 10Y*: 11.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WALSX vs. QLENX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WALSX Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund	5.70%	-12.79%	7.24%	27.75%	-8.38%	12.20%
QLENX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N	-0.83%	34.07%	30.18%	23.67%	18.92%	9.61%

Correlation

The correlation between WALSX and QLENX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021	0.21

Return for Risk

WALSX vs. QLENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WALSX

WALSX Risk / Return Rank: 2
WALSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
WALSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
WALSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
WALSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
WALSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

QLENX

QLENX Risk / Return Rank: 50
QLENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
QLENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
QLENX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
QLENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
QLENX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WALSX vs. QLENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund (WALSX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N (QLENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WALSX	QLENX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.23	2.01	-2.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.23	2.95	-3.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.37	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.28	2.45	-2.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.55	7.54	-8.09

WALSX vs. QLENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WALSX Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the QLENX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WALSX and QLENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WALSX vs. QLENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WALSX drawdown since its inception was -25.28%, smaller than the maximum QLENX drawdown of -38.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WALSX and QLENX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WALSX	QLENX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.28%	-38.50%	+13.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.66%	-6.09%	-6.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.28%	-7.09%	-18.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.19%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.84%	-1.45%	-17.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.61%	-7.46%	-2.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.54%	1.97%	+4.57%

Volatility

WALSX vs. QLENX - Volatility Comparison

Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund (WALSX) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N (QLENX) at 2.85%. This indicates that WALSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WALSX	QLENX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.61%	2.85%	+0.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.75%	5.78%	+5.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.81%	7.40%	+8.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.33%	10.01%	+6.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.33%	10.59%	+5.74%

WALSX vs. QLENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WALSX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QLENX's 1.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

WALSX vs. QLENX - Dividend Comparison

WALSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QLENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QLENX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N	1.65%	1.64%	7.13%	21.21%	14.09%	0.00%	1.59%	0.00%	6.09%	8.91%	2.87%	4.91%
WALSX Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WALSX and QLENX in my portfolio?

WALSX and QLENX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WALSX or QLENX?

WALSX has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to QLENX (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WALSX dropped -25.28% vs QLENX's -38.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.