PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LONGX vs. JAKRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LONGX vs. JAKRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Longboard Fund (LONGX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A (JAKRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LONGX achieves a 13.89% return, which is significantly higher than JAKRX's 12.87% return.


LONGX

1D
0.65%
1M
0.12%
6M
8.32%
YTD
13.89%
1Y
17.09%
3Y*
11.08%
5Y*
5.05%
10Y*
25.01%
ALL TIME*
21.46%

JAKRX

1D
0.22%
1M
2.02%
6M
6.95%
YTD
12.87%
1Y
22.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LONGX vs. JAKRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LONGX and JAKRX is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LONGX vs. JAKRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LONGX
LONGX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
LONGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LONGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
LONGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
LONGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
LONGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

JAKRX
JAKRX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
JAKRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAKRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAKRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
JAKRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAKRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LONGX vs. JAKRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Longboard Fund (LONGX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A (JAKRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LONGXJAKRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.59

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

4.49

-1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.94

13.52

-3.58

LONGX vs. JAKRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LONGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the JAKRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LONGX and JAKRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LONGX vs. JAKRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LONGX drawdown since its inception was -77.16%, which is greater than JAKRX's maximum drawdown of -5.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LONGX and JAKRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LONGXJAKRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.16%

-5.16%

-72.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.09%

-5.16%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-0.87%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.28%

-1.00%

-6.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

1.71%

+0.15%

Volatility

LONGX vs. JAKRX - Volatility Comparison

Longboard Fund (LONGX) has a higher volatility of 2.43% compared to John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A (JAKRX) at 1.33%. This indicates that LONGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAKRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LONGXJAKRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

1.33%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.20%

6.29%

+1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.95%

7.82%

+3.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.88%

7.41%

+4.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

137.78%

7.41%

+130.37%

LONGX vs. JAKRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LONGX has a 1.99% expense ratio, which is higher than JAKRX's 1.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

LONGX vs. JAKRX - Dividend Comparison

LONGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JAKRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.18%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
JAKRX
John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A
7.18%8.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LONGX
Longboard Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%5.40%7.64%1.73%0.00%0.00%3.10%268.50%23.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


LONGX and JAKRX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LONGX has higher volatility (2.43%) compared to JAKRX (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LONGX dropped -77.16% vs JAKRX's -5.16%.

JAKRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LONGX and JAKRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer