PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOM.DE vs. VONG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LOM.DE vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lockheed Martin Corporation (LOM.DE) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LOM.DE is traded in EUR, while VONG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VONG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOM.DE achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 4.20% return. Over the past 10 years, LOM.DE has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 9.91%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.07% annualized return.


LOM.DE

1D
-1.47%
1M
1.29%
6M
-9.13%
YTD
9.45%
1Y
15.09%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
9.91%
ALL TIME*
15.60%

VONG

1D
0.22%
1M
-2.67%
6M
3.45%
YTD
4.20%
1Y
12.58%
3Y*
19.27%
5Y*
12.95%
10Y*
17.07%
ALL TIME*
17.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOM.DE vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LOM.DE
Lockheed Martin Corporation
9.45%-8.77%17.97%-7.98%49.08%12.49%-14.87%57.22%-12.28%15.17%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
4.20%4.39%41.99%38.40%-24.79%37.15%26.90%39.13%3.09%14.07%

Correlation

The correlation between LOM.DE and VONG is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.14

The correlation between LOM.DE and VONG shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOM.DE vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOM.DE
LOM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
LOM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
LOM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOM.DE vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LOM.DE) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LOM.DEVONGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.14

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

0.83

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.22

2.34

-1.12

LOM.DE vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is comparable to the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOM.DE and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LOM.DE vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOM.DE drawdown since its inception was -55.29%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOM.DE and VONG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOM.DEVONGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.29%

-31.19%

-24.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.88%

-15.20%

-10.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.42%

-27.92%

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.42%

-27.92%

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.42%

-31.19%

-4.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.22%

-5.30%

-16.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.62%

-4.92%

-7.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.12%

5.38%

+6.74%

Volatility

LOM.DE vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LOM.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.53% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 5.95%. This indicates that LOM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOM.DEVONGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.53%

5.95%

+1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.78%

12.61%

+7.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.49%

16.83%

+9.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.12%

21.29%

+2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.85%

21.34%

+2.51%

Dividends

LOM.DE vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

LOM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than VONG's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LOM.DE
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.61%2.84%2.62%2.84%2.50%3.38%3.39%2.58%3.59%2.78%2.82%3.07%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.47%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


LOM.DE and VONG have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOM.DE and VONG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer