PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOM.DE vs. ASML.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LOM.DE vs. ASML.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lockheed Martin Corporation (LOM.DE) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOM.DE achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly lower than ASML.AS's 65.64% return. Over the past 10 years, LOM.DE has underperformed ASML.AS with an annualized return of 9.91%, while ASML.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 33.04% annualized return.


LOM.DE

1D
-1.47%
1M
1.29%
6M
-9.13%
YTD
9.45%
1Y
15.09%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
9.91%
ALL TIME*
15.60%

ASML.AS

1D
-1.05%
1M
-8.26%
6M
36.22%
YTD
65.64%
1Y
141.98%
3Y*
35.64%
5Y*
21.59%
10Y*
33.04%
ALL TIME*
23.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOM.DE vs. ASML.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LOM.DE
Lockheed Martin Corporation
9.45%-8.77%17.97%-7.98%49.08%12.49%-14.87%57.22%-12.28%15.17%
ASML.AS
ASML Holding N.V.
65.64%37.08%0.36%36.66%-27.83%78.74%52.10%95.32%-4.67%37.45%

Correlation

The correlation between LOM.DE and ASML.AS is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2007

0.10

The correlation between LOM.DE and ASML.AS shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (3 years) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOM.DE vs. ASML.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOM.DE
LOM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
LOM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
LOM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

ASML.AS
ASML.AS Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ASML.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASML.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASML.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ASML.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASML.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOM.DE vs. ASML.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LOM.DE) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LOM.DEASML.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.47

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

10.19

-9.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.22

28.48

-27.26

LOM.DE vs. ASML.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the ASML.AS Sharpe Ratio of 3.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOM.DE and ASML.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LOM.DE vs. ASML.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOM.DE drawdown since its inception was -55.29%, roughly equal to the maximum ASML.AS drawdown of -56.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOM.DE and ASML.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOM.DEASML.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.29%

-56.76%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.88%

-13.69%

-12.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.42%

-44.77%

+9.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.42%

-47.93%

+12.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.42%

-47.93%

+12.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.22%

-11.65%

-10.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.62%

-14.83%

+2.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.12%

4.92%

+7.20%

Volatility

LOM.DE vs. ASML.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LOM.DE) is 7.53%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML.AS) has a volatility of 16.32%. This indicates that LOM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOM.DEASML.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.53%

16.32%

-8.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.78%

32.04%

-12.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.49%

41.27%

-14.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.12%

39.09%

-14.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.85%

34.47%

-10.62%

Dividends

LOM.DE vs. ASML.AS - Dividend Comparison

LOM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than ASML.AS's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASML.AS
ASML Holding N.V.
0.49%0.71%0.92%0.87%1.28%0.47%0.64%1.19%1.02%0.83%0.98%0.85%
LOM.DE
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.61%2.84%2.62%2.84%2.50%3.38%3.39%2.58%3.59%2.78%2.82%3.07%

Financials

LOM.DE vs. ASML.AS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lockheed Martin Corporation and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LOM.DE and ASML.AS have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOM.DE and ASML.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer